Teams

1-DGolden-CHTC

2022 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-03vs 4-JSykes-CCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesDina Golden / Bobbi Crummett vs Patricia Carroll / Anne Brady3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-26vs 5-LOakley-CHCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesDina Golden / Judith Mapstone vs Laurie Rechholtz / Dorene Palermo6-2, 6-0
2022-04-19vs 2-RKronmiller-HR-55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesDina Golden / Judith Mapstone vs Cindy Rossitch / Bobbie Dahlgren6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-29vs 8-HKoo-UNCWon 10
W#3 DoublesSharron Docherty / Dina Golden vs Rosalind Coleman / Lynne Hicks6-1, 6-2
2022-03-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Ederle / Dina Golden vs Lori Davis / Betty Davis6-1, 6-2
2022-03-01vs 7-MMacdonald-HSLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandy Onstad / Dina Golden vs Jennifer Hoffmann / Millicent Snow5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Dina Golden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Sarah Ederle
published
2.10
Judith Mapstone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Ederle + Dina Golden7456% games+6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dina Golden
103W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Sarah Ederle
39W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.11
Judith Mapstone
0W–18L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.