Teams

Mood Swings

2024 Adult 55 and Over League · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-19vs Wailea High FivesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJan Bryan / Christina Haywood vs Susan Sato / Michelle DeFilippi7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTamara Bexton / Sonia Kreag vs Donna Revells / Patricia Keau6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Davis / Maureen Keirnes vs Linda Coleon / Virginia Suddath1-6, 6-7
2024-05-18vs Wailea High FivesLost 03
L#1 DoublesTamara Bexton / Sonia Kreag vs Barbara Grandon / Susan Sato4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJan Bryan / Kathleen Styer vs Gaela Prince / Michelle DeFilippi4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Keirnes / Janet Davis vs Linda Coleon / Patricia Keau5-7, 2-6
2024-05-12vs Lahaina LoBstersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJan Bryan / Christina Haywood vs Monica Bice / Barbara Skaggs6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSonia Kreag / Tamara Bexton vs Tania Kellermeyer / Celeste Abate2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Styer / Janet Davis vs Susan Bailey / Luly Baker3-6, 2-6
2024-05-05vs Maui SunshineLost 03
L#1 DoublesTamara Bexton / Sonia Kreag vs Pamela Henry / Carol Lam2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Baum / Jan Bryan vs Lore Lee Robello / Amanda Tillson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMindy Armour / Christina Haywood vs Rowena Nikki Baysa / Colette Watanabe4-6, 5-7
2024-05-04vs Lahaina LoBstersLost 03
L#1 DoublesSonia Kreag / Tamara Bexton vs Lea Williams-Doherty / Celeste Abate1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Styer / Maureen Keirnes vs Nancy Cross / Barbara Skaggs1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJan Bryan / Janet Davis vs Rebecca Bowie / JOYCE ANNE BUSTILLOS-OHANLON3-6, 4-6
2024-04-21vs Mike's 7.0 WomenWon 21
W#1 DoublesJan Bryan / Mindy Armour vs Mickey Haller / Jill Kanahele6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristina Haywood / Mina Welch vs Corinne Tanabe / Deanna DiBiase1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Sawyer / Kathleen Styer vs Janie King / Jane Sakakihara6-3, 6-3
2024-04-20vs Maui SunshineLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarla Nutt / Mina Welch vs Pamela Henry / Carol Lam3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSonia Kreag / Cynthia Sawyer vs Catherine Hall / Lore Lee Robello6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Baum / Christina Haywood vs Daphne Okamoto / Trudi Vierra3-6, 4-6
2024-04-14vs Mike's 7.0 WomenWon 21
W#1 DoublesJan Bryan / Mina Welch vs Val McKelvey / Darleen Ornellas7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathleen Styer / Karen Baum vs Rachael Barnard / Jill Kanahele4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKarla Nutt / Janet Davis vs Janie King / Jane Sakakihara6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Karla Nutt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Cynthia Sawyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Mina Welch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Jan Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.11
Mindy Armour
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Christina Haywood
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Sonia Kreag
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Janet Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Baum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Styer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Maureen Keirnes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tamara Bexton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Bryan + Cynthia Sawyer8158% games+8.5% vs expected
Christina Haywood + Karla Nutt3251% games+4.8% vs expected
Tamara Bexton + Sonia Kreag4550% games−2.6% vs expected
Jan Bryan + Christina Haywood4743% games−2.8% vs expected
Christina Haywood + Mina Welch3643% games−4.8% vs expected
Christina Haywood + Cynthia Sawyer4251% games−6.2% vs expected
Jan Bryan + Mindy Armour3347% gamesnot enough data
Jan Bryan + Karla Nutt3345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karla Nutt
102W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Cynthia Sawyer
56W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
Mina Welch
33W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Jan Bryan
51W–59L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Mindy Armour
17W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Christina Haywood
33W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sonia Kreag
31W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Janet Davis
37W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.03
Karen Baum
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Styer
10W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Keirnes
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tamara Bexton
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.