Teams

Backhanded Compliments

2021 Circle D Tennis Club Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.04 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-09vs MortonWon 21
L#1 DoublesPam Henley / Amanda Shumate vs Leslie Roecklein / Elizabeth Simon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCathie Boarman / Alicia Mabry vs Stephanie Heinrichs / Gina Lease4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Cipolla / Elizabeth Jones vs Caroline Horwath / Krissie Zenkewicz6-0, 6-1
2021-06-07vs Back That Ace UpLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Gardner / Lee WILLIAMS vs Tricia Chancellor / Jodi Murray1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAlicia Mabry vs Kimberly LaRose1-6, 1-6
2021-05-26vs MortonWon 20
W#2 DoublesStephanie Jurkovic / Pam Henley vs Caroline Horwath / Andrea Smolen7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Gardner / Lee WILLIAMS vs Allison Murray / Marie Welsh4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-19vs MortonWon 10
W#3 DoublesLee WILLIAMS / Angela Gardner vs Allison Murray / Krissie Zenkewicz6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-17vs Back That Ace UpLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Shumate / Amy Lamont vs Tricia Chancellor / Alison Martin1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Cipolla / Pam Henley vs Kim Meissner / Jodi Murray1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShelley Swaim / Donna Jones vs Erin Meehan / Brooke Santry3-6, 1-6
2021-05-12vs MortonWon 30
W#1 DoublesShelley Swaim / Pam Henley vs Sara Magden / Alanna Volatile6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCathie Boarman / Alicia Mabry vs Amy Fipps / Allison Murray6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLee WILLIAMS vs Leslie Roecklein6-2, 6-2
2021-05-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Lamont / Amanda Shumate vs Tricia Chancellor / Alison Martin0-6, 2-6
2021-05-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Shumate / Shelley Swaim vs Tricia Chancellor / Alison Martin1-6, 1-6
2021-04-28vs MortonWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Shumate / Shelley Swaim vs Susie Weinberg / Karen Pitsley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Gardner / Lee WILLIAMS vs Laura Hieronymus / Marie Welsh6-3, 6-4
2021-04-26vs Back That Ace UpLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Cipolla / Susan Flaherty vs Hannah Arnold Smith / Kimberly LaRose5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Conklin / Alicia Mabry vs Tricia Chancellor / Alison Martin4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Rosenberg / Claudia Silberglitt vs Kara Jones / Jodi Murray4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Alicia Mabry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.94
Susan Flaherty
published
2.94
Stephanie Jurkovic
published
2.93
Lee WILLIAMS
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.92
Kelly Cipolla
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Shelley Swaim
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.81
Claudia Silberglitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amy Lamont
published 3
2.75
Angela Gardner
published 3
2.74
Wendy Rosenberg
published
2.70
Amanda Shumate
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Christine Baehr
published 3
2.53
Anne Conklin
published 3
2.52
Pam Henley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cathie Boarman
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Swaim + Amanda Shumate395646% games−6.1% vs expected
Kelly Cipolla + Shelley Swaim5943% gamesnot enough data
Pam Henley + Amanda Shumate4454% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Cipolla + Claudia Silberglitt1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alicia Mabry
86W–69L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Susan Flaherty
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.94
Stephanie Jurkovic
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Lee WILLIAMS
50W–47L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Kelly Cipolla
106W–137L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3.5
Shelley Swaim
124W–168L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Claudia Silberglitt
98W–73L career · 1 line in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Amy Lamont
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Angela Gardner
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Wendy Rosenberg
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Amanda Shumate
96W–120L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Christine Baehr
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Anne Conklin
8W–14L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
2.53
3
Pam Henley
49W–88L career · 4 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Cathie Boarman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.