Teams

MTC Cousineau

2026 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-08vs Westwood KellyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMikhil Sanduria / Pamela Stidham vs Mary LaFratta / Yancey Jones6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Mayhew / Chris Pecci vs Kristin Rothermel / Harry Turton4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Kratzer / Chris Hayes vs Lauren Jones / Jackson Dyer2-6, 0-6
2026-06-29vs Hermitage ShrinerLost 03
L#1 DoublesGreg Dean / Jennifer Shaffer vs Michelle Holmes / David Campbell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChris Hayes / Leigh Ann Barker vs Todd Furbee / Jeanine Wisor2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Cousineau / Amanda Mayhew vs AMY LINES / Kelby Morgan1-6, 0-6
2026-06-24vs ACAC Double Shots-BoschLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Pecci / Pamela Stidham vs Christopher Chandler / Sonya Carman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Kratzer / Rafael Garrido vs Chris Naughton / Whitney Shelton3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Mayhew / Michael Cousineau vs Ben Hall / Jennifer Flournoy1-6, 4-6
2026-06-12vs ACAC HatcherLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Shaffer / Greg Dean vs Andrea Schuetzinger / Ken Hatcher6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Stidham / Chris Pecci vs Anne Saunier / Holland Gravely6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeigh Ann Barker / Chris Hayes vs Christina Aeinan Kang / Eddie Kim5-7, 1-6
2026-06-11vs MAC McDormanLost 12
W#1 DoublesGreg Dean / Jennifer Shaffer vs Warren Smigo / Lindsay Hardage6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLeigh Ann Barker / Michael Cousineau vs Carol Gregory / Ken Hammond1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRafael Garrido / Amanda Mayhew vs James Holland / Lara Hansen1-6, 1-6
2026-06-03vs ACAC LewisLost 12
L#1 DoublesGreg Dean / Leigh Ann Barker vs Paul Davis / Rachel Love5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Stidham / Rafael Garrido vs Dina Weddle / Cliff Heller3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Cousineau / Julie Kratzer vs Matt Curtis / Grace Kim0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-22vs Burkwood Allen Mix 40Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Mayhew / Mikhil Sanduria vs Rochelle Purmasir / Tom Newton2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Cousineau / Julie Kratzer vs Chris Gillam / Modestine Carter2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Shaffer / Greg Dean vs Tommy Harris / Cathie Tiernan7-5, 7-6
2026-05-19vs MAC - Hammers - MessmerLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Shaffer / Chris Pecci vs Josh Reynal / Irina Schaffernoth0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRafael Garrido / Julie Kratzer vs Debbie Messmer / Dylan Brod6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Cousineau / Pamela Stidham vs Charles Samson / Tanisha Moseley0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MAC McDorman9020716189
2ACAC Double Shots-Bosch54161128235
3Hermitage Shriner44111328218
4Raintree May4491534245
5ACAC Lewis36121533247
6ACAC Hatcher2581327200
7Burkwood Allen Mix 401761838266
8MTC Cousineau0842041270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Mikhil Sanduria
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Jennifer Shaffer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Julie Kratzer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.64
Leigh Ann Barker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Greg Dean
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.55
Chris Pecci
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Pamela Stidham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Rafael Garrido
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Michael Cousineau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Chris Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Amanda Mayhew
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Dean + Jennifer Shaffer6355% games+8.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mikhil Sanduria
21W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Jennifer Shaffer
19W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Julie Kratzer
59W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Leigh Ann Barker
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Greg Dean
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Chris Pecci
7W–11L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Pamela Stidham
62W–94L career · 5 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Rafael Garrido
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
Michael Cousineau
12W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Chris Hayes
14W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amanda Mayhew
10W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.