Teams

Newman-TOCC

2024 Mixed 55 & Over-GC · 3.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-25vs Pass Christian MixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Chapman / Louis Peters vs Ruth Welch / Brian Welch3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShari Newman / Bubba Newman vs Phyllis Aduddell / Randall Thiriot0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesConnie Johnston / James Whitney vs Pamela Wixon / ED LOZES6-1, 6-1
2024-06-12vs Biloxi Lyons 55Won 20
W#2 DoublesConnie Johnston / John Cleary vs Kim Lyons / David Thames6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTerry OConnor / Chris Ashbaker vs Clem Fantroy / Larry Barlow6-4, 6-1
2024-06-06vs Biloxi Lyons 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Cleary / Mildred Dickson vs Patrick Chubb / Jolene McMorran2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRobbie Johnson / Shari Newman vs Kim Lyons / Bob Thunelius1-6, 1-6
2024-05-20vs Pass Christian MixedWon 21
L#1 DoublesShari Newman / Bubba Newman vs Ruth Welch / Brian Welch3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Ashbaker / Robbie Johnson vs Alane Young / Charles Young6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Chapman / Chris Ashbaker vs Jo Ann Lozes / Porter Pryor6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Connie Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Mildred Dickson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Mary Ashbaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Terry OConnor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Bubba Newman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
James Whitney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Chris Ashbaker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.27
Shari Newman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Louis Peters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robbie Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bubba Newman + Shari Newman3833% games−6.2% vs expected
Robbie Johnson + Mary Ashbaker3346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Connie Johnston
61W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.15
Mildred Dickson
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
Mary Ashbaker
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Terry OConnor
30W–32L career · 1 line in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Bubba Newman
10W–45L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
James Whitney
24W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Chris Ashbaker
10W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.41
Shari Newman
12W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
2.27
Louis Peters
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Robbie Johnson
14W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.