Teams

TOC.Irish

2024 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-04-25vs PW.MartinLost 02
L#2 DoublesLusia Li / Kari Moncrief vs Rebecca Jacobsen / Leah Lee4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Enderline / Dana Frazier vs Kathryn Stone / June Plotkin2-6, 1-6
2024-04-18vs TOC.RessLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelly Jude / Rosanne Facktor vs Beth Godfrey / Maya Ress4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Enderline / Pamela Schoenfeld vs Valerie Dorrier / Mary Parker2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDana Frazier / Kari Moncrief vs Mary Jo Alexander / KAREN CROW2-6, 2-6
2024-04-11vs PW.FitzgeraldLost 12
L#1 DoublesShelly Jude / Rosanne Facktor vs Michelle Fitzgerald / Elaine Auslander2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Schoenfeld / Kari Moncrief vs Meg McDevitt / Marylynn Fitzgerald0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Frazier / Carol Stogner vs Elizabeth Eubanks / Janna Fisler6-4, 6-3
2024-04-04vs TOC.ThioWon 21
W#1 DoublesShelly Jude / Regina Davis vs Angela Ehland / Gauri Johnson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRosanne Facktor / Kari Moncrief vs Kati Ray / Victoria Thio3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Enderline / Dana Frazier vs Joanne Kochuk / Stephanie Jabusch7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-03-30vs TOC.CampbellWon 30
W#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Rosanne Facktor vs Nadine Williams / Denise Wilson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrenda Pratt / Yvonne Acker vs Nicole Gagnon / Chris Jackson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Stogner / Dana Frazier vs Amy Demsko / Nancy Myer7-5, 6-0
2024-03-21vs TOC.PowellLost 03
L#1 DoublesRosanne Facktor / Shelly Jude vs Sharon Paye / Julie Brigham2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLusia Li / Pamela Schoenfeld vs Brenda Steele / Takako Schenberger6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Enderline / Kari Moncrief vs Donna Gast / Kim Tobey2-6, 3-6
2024-03-14vs MD.MetcalfSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRosanne Facktor / Lusia Li vs Claire Cesta / Kimberly Kenney6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShelly Jude / Carol Stogner vs Sally Grogan / Margaret Cheek3-6, 6-7
2024-02-29vs CAS.TrailWon 20
W#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Yvonne Acker vs Ann Locher / Jane Hoffman1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Frazier / Lusia Li vs Dell Pinkston / Mayela Harris7-5, 6-4
2024-02-22vs TOC.LositoLost 03
L#1 DoublesRosanne Facktor / Shelly Jude vs Brenda Polonio / Lynelle Boorey0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLusia Li / Carol Stogner vs Kathryn Jezior / Anne Farmer2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDana Frazier / Kari Moncrief vs Jill Cardella / Richelle Robinson4-6, 2-6
2024-02-15vs KF.EvansLost 03
L#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Lusia Li vs Karon Mertens / Kathy Plattner0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Pratt / Michele Raymond Dolitka vs Jane Doe / Virginia Lewis2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDana Frazier / Carol Stogner vs Legare Woods / Bracha Blanc6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Lusia Li
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Pamela Schoenfeld
published
3.21
Regina Davis
published
3.16
Rosanne Facktor
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.13
Shelly Jude
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Yvonne Acker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Brenda Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Dana Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Elizabeth Enderline
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Kari Moncrief
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Frazier + Rosanne Facktor5651% games+14.7% vs expected
Shelly Jude + Rosanne Facktor1938% games−8.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Enderline + Dana Frazier5256% gamesnot enough data
Kari Moncrief + Rosanne Facktor0634% gamesnot enough data
Shelly Jude + Regina Davis1440% gamesnot enough data
Kari Moncrief + Shelly Jude044 matchesnot enough data
Kari Moncrief + Elizabeth Enderline033 matchesnot enough data
Regina Davis + Yvonne Acker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lusia Li
66W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
Pamela Schoenfeld
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Regina Davis
36W–56L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Rosanne Facktor
35W–73L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Shelly Jude
135W–162L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Yvonne Acker
128W–167L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Brenda Pratt
97W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Dana Frazier
126W–125L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Elizabeth Enderline
93W–149L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Kari Moncrief
94W–150L career · 9 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.