Teams

KWahr (Carmel)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-04vs JCook/Weaver (PCC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSheri Sayman / Debbie Starling vs Jennie Cook / Janet Gilliam3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErrin Jensen / Kim Walters vs Nicole Daugherty / Nancy Stenersen6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarcie Elaasar / Tara Walker vs Melissa Weaver / Brooke Hassell2-6, 0-6
2026-08-28vs ASchaaf (Charlotte CC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDorian Dipangrazio / Marcie Elaasar vs Anna Glass / Amy Moore6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeredith Starling / Kim Walters vs Jordan Collier / Alexandra Mann4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTara Walker / Jenn Mattscheck vs Christen Scott / Margaret Bradley6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-21vs DWhitmore (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcie Elaasar / Debbie Starling vs Leslie Buben / Missy Goodrich1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMeredith Starling / Errin Jensen vs Tracy Brea / Andra Norman2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTara Walker / Jenn Mattscheck vs Ginna Tate / Tanya Willett2-6, 4-6
2026-08-14vs CHighfield (FCC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKristine Wahr / Molly Morris vs Debbie Malseed / Lauren Epperly7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheri Sayman / Lori Anderson vs Kim Ransom / Michelle DeVaney2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTara Walker / Meredith Starling vs Anne Paramore / Danielle Shealy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-07vs CSpera (Blakeney)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMolly Morris / Kristine Wahr vs Lisa Craig / Nancy Miller0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSheri Sayman / Marcie Elaasar vs Kelly Levitas / Eden Serekeberhan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Starling / Lori Anderson vs Dawn Wohlfarth / Cynthia Spera3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ASauls/DToomey (OPRC)2060038
2KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington)2060126
3KCrane (Palisades)2060229
4ABvanMeter (Southampton)2042448
5MMetzl (Rama)2051448
6LDunning (Mason Wallace)2042540
7THolwager (Lifetime)1030015
8JRuggiero (Palisades)1021222
9MSevigny (Carmel)1142447
10AKinder (Weddington Chase)1142448
11DWhitmore (Carmel)1133653
12AConger/DConrad (OPRC)1142649
13SAbbott (Queens)1133749
14JCook/Weaver (PCC)1133751
15KTreece/EBass (Sardis)1133759
16JCugliari (BCC)1133753
17BLeonnig (Queens)1124855
18KWahr (Carmel)11241068
19LPinzon (Life Time)11241071
20DO'Connor/SFloyd (OPRC)000000
21ASchaaf (Charlotte CC)0112534
22CChildress (Chlt Tennis Matthews)0224853
23FBey/TFunderburk (Queens)0224964
24LPratt (Queens)02241070
25KGilchrist/KBoyles (Mason Wallace)02151062
26LFerguson/RLee (Park Road)02151065
27GHildner (River Hills)02151174
28VKoskinas (WSRC)02061267
29LPowell/HJohnson (Life Time)02061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Kristine Wahr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Sara Porrata
published 3.5
3.20
Errin Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Molly Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Debbie Starling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Jenn Mattscheck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Marcie Elaasar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Meredith Starling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Sheri Sayman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Dorian Dipangrazio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Walters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Morris + Kristine Wahr314 matchesnot enough data
Sara Porrata + Errin Jensen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Wahr
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Sara Porrata
65W–40L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Errin Jensen
39W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Molly Morris
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Debbie Starling
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jenn Mattscheck
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Marcie Elaasar
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Meredith Starling
14W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Sheri Sayman
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
Dorian Dipangrazio
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kim Walters
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Anderson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.