Teams

Kozar/18/Div2/WD/BREC

2023 BR Tri-Level 18 & Over - Women Day · 4.0,3.5,3.0 BR (18&O) Women Day

20 players · average NTRP 3.29 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 BR (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Maria Pereira
published
3.73
Kim Elston
published
3.68
Lisa Marie Raiford
published
3.56
Kimberly Heroman
published
3.46
Hollie Easterling
published 3.5
3.43
Kristine Jones
published
3.42
3.37
Bridgette Caruso
published 3.5
3.35
Jenna Kozar
published
3.31
Melissa Peairs
published
3.28
Sonni Bernhard
published
Heather Day
published 3.5
3.24
Sarah Musgrove
published
3.20
Carmen Lavergne
published 3.5
3.19
Leah Jenkins
published
3.18
Paula Simpson
published
2.86
Holly Hatzis
published 3
2.85
Jade McDowell
published 3
2.82
Kristy Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenna Kozar + Hollie Easterling7260% games+6.3% vs expected
Catherine Rosenfeld + Carmen Lavergne12754% games+0.4% vs expected
Jenna Kozar + Paula Simpson6162% games−2.4% vs expected
Robin McCullough-Bade + Paula Simpson0631% games−9.5% vs expected
Leah Jenkins + Paula Simpson134 matchesnot enough data
Bridgette Caruso + Holly Hatzis134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Pereira
85W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
Kim Elston
42W–56L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Lisa Marie Raiford
65W–88L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Kimberly Heroman
45W–32L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Hollie Easterling
68W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Kristine Jones
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Robin McCullough-Bade
3W–22L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Bridgette Caruso
86W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jenna Kozar
36W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.35
Melissa Peairs
43W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Sonni Bernhard
53W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Heather Day
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Musgrove
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Carmen Lavergne
70W–44L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Leah Jenkins
21W–25L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Paula Simpson
29W–29L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Holly Hatzis
44W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Jade McDowell
21W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Catherine Rosenfeld
81W–39L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
Kristy Pham
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.