Teams

Vorys 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 SinglesDaniel Paredes vs William Craft1-2
W#2 SinglesBRAD VANNOY vs Hagen Molitoris6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTrevor Gilbert vs Sean Jones2-6, 3-6
2025-09-17vs Augustine 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesJohn Little vs Luke Mills6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChip Roth vs Jackson Honeycutt2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMike Vorys vs Anders Gustavsson2-6, 2-6
2025-09-10vs LeFevre 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesJohn Little vs William Davis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJack Royals vs Arick Tuhro6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBRAD VANNOY vs Kevin Kemp1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTrevor Gilbert vs Rod Mendoza4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJack Royals vs JJ Flores6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJack Royals vs Sean Jones6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesChip Roth vs Jack Monroe3-6, 0-6
2025-08-13vs Augustine 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 01
L#1 SinglesRobert Chen vs Jason Lewis6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Robert Chen
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Jack Royals
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
John Little
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Trevor Gilbert
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.84
BRAD VANNOY
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.67
Mike Vorys
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Daniel Paredes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.43
Chip Roth
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Vorys + John Little134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robert Chen
55W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Jack Royals
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
John Little
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Trevor Gilbert
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
BRAD VANNOY
14W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
Mike Vorys
8W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Daniel Paredes
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
2.5
Chip Roth
3W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.