Teams

River Warriors 3.5

2025 Corpus Christi 40 & Over USTA League · Forty & Over Mens 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-04vs Tennis RodmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesJuan Rios Sr / Adam Madrid vs Steven Trigger / Preston Ley6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesErnesto Monroy vs Chandra Sanwal6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Wilson / Bill Smith vs David Lopez / Leo Cortez6-3, 6-3
2025-01-16vs Tennis RodmanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDavid Wilson / Caleb Crumley vs Steven Trigger / Preston Ley6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesErnesto Monroy vs David Lopez7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBill Smith / Alexander Aitken vs John Borkowski / Anil Gungor6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Avalos / Miguel Aceves vs Roger Amador / Leo Cortez4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Forty & Over Mens 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Caleb Crumley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Juan Rios Sr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Ernesto Monroy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Adam Madrid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Bill Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Alexander Aitken
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Miguel Aceves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Roy Gonzalez
published
2.39
Richard Avalos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miguel Aceves + Alexander Aitken2344% games+2.4% vs expected
Adam Madrid + Bill Smith1840% games+1.8% vs expected
Adam Madrid + Alexander Aitken0527% games−12.9% vs expected
Adam Madrid + Caleb Crumley2437% gamesnot enough data
Adam Madrid + Miguel Aceves123 matchesnot enough data
Adam Madrid + Roy Gonzalez033 matchesnot enough data
Adam Madrid + Ernesto Monroy213 matchesnot enough data
Miguel Aceves + Roy Gonzalez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caleb Crumley
28W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Juan Rios Sr
42W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Ernesto Monroy
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Adam Madrid
12W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Bill Smith
16W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Alexander Aitken
5W–22L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Miguel Aceves
16W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Roy Gonzalez
32W–41L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Richard Avalos
3W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.