Teams

LLTC - Singles In Your Area

2026 HTA Fall League Monday Men's Singles · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime Cypress000000
2MPTC - Gambit000000
3LLTC - Groot000000
4MPTC - Baseliner000000
5LLTC - GeoProfs000000
6Lost Forest - Underdawgs000000
7JCC - Shingo's Shingles000000
8LLTC - Singles In Your Area000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Matthew Watts
published
3.67
Michail Danos
published
3.59
Wayne Tie
published
3.55
Sasan Ziatabar
published
3.53
Thomas Ngo
published
3.28
Max Deleon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michail Danos + Thomas Ngo224 matchesnot enough data
Michail Danos + Max Deleon213 matchesnot enough data
Michail Danos + Wayne Tie123 matchesnot enough data
Max Deleon + Wayne Tie303 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Ngo + Wayne Tie213 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Ngo + Matthew Watts213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Watts
53W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.78
4
Christopher Murphy
24W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michail Danos
28W–19L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Wayne Tie
25W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Sasan Ziatabar
12W–18L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Thomas Ngo
37W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Max Deleon
23W–45L career · no lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.