Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0B

2024 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Donna Himenez
published 4
3.89
Euna Roh
published 4
3.89
Nancy Wilson
published
3.85
Nancy Doan
published
3.82
Laurie Radanovich
published
3.81
Kelly Saenz
published
3.79
Shari Mcaneney
published
3.79
Lynn Dowse
published
3.76
Judy Cummins
published
3.75
3.74
Lisa McGuinness
published
3.73
Sally Fitzhugh
published
3.65
Sally McKay
published
3.64
Donna Vis
published 4
3.52
Sarah Westphal
published
3.51
Tanya Lo
published
3.50
Ning Docena
published
3.42
Nancy Korich
published
3.38
Regina Hughes
published
3.33
Kay Johnson
published
3.27
Susan Rossi
published
3.17
Cynthia Attiyeh
published 3.5
Sharyn Lawrence
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa McGuinness + Sally McKay3550% games−9.1% vs expected
Donna Himenez + Nancy Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Ning Docena + Judy Cummins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Himenez
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Euna Roh
22W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.89
Nancy Wilson
19W–27L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.89
Nancy Doan
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
Laurie Radanovich
44W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
Kelly Saenz
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.81
Shari Mcaneney
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Lynn Dowse
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Judy Cummins
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christine Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Lisa McGuinness
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Sally Fitzhugh
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Sally McKay
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Donna Vis
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
Sarah Westphal
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Tanya Lo
9W–22L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
Ning Docena
13W–26L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Nancy Korich
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.42
Regina Hughes
36W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kay Johnson
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.33
Susan Rossi
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia Attiyeh
11W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Sharyn Lawrence
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.