Teams

BCC-Beckdahl

2023 OH OV SUMMER A65&O · 2023 SUMMER A65&O 8.0M Dayton

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-25vs BCC-BenningtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Beckdahl / Stephen Hayden vs Christopher Bennington / James Brooks7-5, 7-6
2023-06-29vs BCC-BenningtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Bosse / John Peyton vs David Burkhardt / Robert Huston6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Case / Mark Halpin vs David Iden / James Lewis7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDonald Nguyen / Edward McCall vs Gary Engelhard / David Garrison6-2, 6-1
2023-06-17vs BCC-BenningtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Beckdahl / Greg Toman vs Jim Hogue / James Lewis7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonald Nguyen / Edward McCall vs David Garrison / Gary Williamson6-4, 6-0
2023-05-20vs BCC-BenningtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Beckdahl / Greg Toman vs Christopher Bennington / David Burkhardt6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJames Bosse / Edward McCall vs Robert Huston / James Brooks6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2023 SUMMER A65&O 8.0M Dayton
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BCC-Beckdahl50114899
2BCC-Bennington0521326161

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Bosse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.89
Stephen Hayden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Greg Toman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brooks Compton
published 4
Donald Nguyen
published 4
3.39
Edward McCall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
David Case
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Peyton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Beckdahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Halpin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Beckdahl + Stephen Hayden4153% gamesnot enough data
Edward McCall + Brooks Compton314 matchesnot enough data
David Case + Mark Beckdahl303 matchesnot enough data
David Case + Mark Halpin213 matchesnot enough data
Greg Toman + Mark Halpin303 matchesnot enough data
Mark Beckdahl + Mark Halpin213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Halpin + Donald Nguyen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Bosse
30W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephen Hayden
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Greg Toman
130W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Brooks Compton
40W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Donald Nguyen
32W–49L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Edward McCall
38W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
David Case
18W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
John Peyton
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mark Beckdahl
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Halpin
46W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.