Teams

BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll/

2025 NCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 5.0 Adult Men 1

10 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-03vs RFL:Racquets for Life:Burda/Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Romaine / Eric Lutz vs Matthew Urbanetti / Christian Coley3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Holschlag vs Jeffrey Bowers7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJason Sucoll / Andrew Martin vs Carlos Salmon / Brian Boyle4-6, 0-6
2025-03-29vs RFL:Racquets for Life:Burda/Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Holschlag / Jonathan Lippert vs Reid Risinger / Christian Coley6-3, 2-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEli Phelps vs Nick Cary1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJason Sucoll / Andrew Martin vs James Burda / Jeffrey Bowers2-6, 3-6
2025-03-08vs RFL:Racquets for Life:Burda/Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDustin Parente / Eli Phelps vs Christian Coley / Matthew Urbanetti4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Holschlag vs Jeffrey Bowers6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJason Sucoll / Jonathan Lippert vs Zander Lowe / James Burda3-6, 7-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Adult Men 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
John Holschlag
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.56
Alex Romaine
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.55
Jonathan Lippert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.49
Andrew Martin
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.44
Eli Phelps
usually #1 Singles 85%, also #1 Doubles 15% · published
4.37
Robert L Barton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Eric Lutz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.08
Jason Sucoll
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Dustin Parente
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Schmitz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Lippert + John Holschlag9164% games+7.9% vs expected
Jason Sucoll + Eric Lutz13457% games+1.0% vs expected
Eric Lutz + Alex Romaine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Holschlag
47W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.64
5
Alex Romaine
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.56
Jonathan Lippert
28W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Andrew Martin
28W–13L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
4.49
Eli Phelps
13W–4L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.44
Robert L Barton
42W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
Eric Lutz
22W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
Jason Sucoll
37W–27L career · 14 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
Dustin Parente
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Schmitz
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.