Teams

Mission Oaks Parks & Wreck

2026 SoCal Doubles 18&Over -- WEEKDAY WOMEN · Ventura Women 3.5 WD

17 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · Ventura Women 3.5 WD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1One Love000000
2Match Point000000
3Pierpont Racquettes000000
4Mission Oaks Parks & Wreck000000
5Sherwood Stars000000
6Sunset Depoach Mode000000
7Up Your Aces000000
8Malibu Waves000000
9Malibu Beach Ballers000000
10Ojai Love Hurts000000
11Spanish Hills 40 Love000000
12Las Posas Point Break000000
13WACky Girls000000
14Real Racquets of Westlake000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Roberta Reis
published 3.5
3.54
Mignonne Nieva
published
3.53
Michelle Duddy
published 3.5
3.44
Denise Bolish
published 3.5
3.42
Kristin Casanova
published 3.5
3.39
Michele Ploudre
published
3.28
Annie Kakuk
published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Khiem
published
3.23
Leilani Mayer
published
3.21
Carolina Britt
published 3
3.18
Barbara Nelles
published 3.5
3.16
Elizabeth Jensen
published 3.5
3.14
Juliet Brown
published
3.08
Judy Liu
published
3.02
Julie Kurowski
published
2.97
Van Stephenson
published
2.87
Kelly Decker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Duddy + Roberta Reis23169% games+12.5% vs expected
Denise Bolish + Kristin Casanova753257% games+3.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Jensen + Michelle Duddy3360% games+1.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Jensen + Roberta Reis5642% games−4.5% vs expected
Annie Kakuk + Elizabeth Jensen4641% games−5.1% vs expected
Judy Liu + Julie Kurowski0727% games−21.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Jensen + Juliet Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Khiem + Carolina Britt404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Roberta Reis
72W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
Mignonne Nieva
16W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Michelle Duddy
101W–71L career · no lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Denise Bolish
123W–60L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Kristin Casanova
100W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Michele Ploudre
13W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Annie Kakuk
13W–10L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Jennifer Khiem
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Leilani Mayer
4W–14L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Carolina Britt
23W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
3.5
Barbara Nelles
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Elizabeth Jensen
14W–15L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Juliet Brown
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Judy Liu
8W–16L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Julie Kurowski
4W–16L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Van Stephenson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kelly Decker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.