Teams

ACP.Terjesen

2026 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-04-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Lee / Betsy Terjesen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-09vs MD.MetcalfLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Lee / Myra Peterson vs Joanne Burton / Merri Metcalf4-6, 0-6
2026-04-07vs LOCH.SigginsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Myra Peterson vs Susan Coulter / Lisa Capetanos6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLouise Hutchinson / Kimberlei Gill vs Lisa Sockett / Kathy Rex6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBetsy Terjesen / Cheryl Morgenstein vs Susan Wisdom / Susan Hoffman6-2, 6-2
2026-03-31vs CP.MunleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberlei Gill / Louise Hutchinson vs Gail Stone / Dana Frazier4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMyra Peterson / Robin Finn vs Mary Munley / Michele Kisthardt3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Hanna Sturgis vs Sheila Biddle / Susan Weinberg6-2, 6-2
2026-03-24vs CAS.DeAngelisLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Lee / Hanna Sturgis vs Dell Pinkston / Michiyo Pedersen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Bunce / Lisa Mason vs Anu Bhagawan / Jodi Harelson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLouise Hutchinson / Kimberlei Gill vs Barbara Longobardo / Catherine Chan6-3, 6-2
2026-03-19vs CAS.TrailLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Lee / Peggy Dobbins vs Cindy Bechtholdt / Sandy Alex1-6, 4-6
2026-03-17vs PW.NeighborsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Myra Peterson vs Jennifer Smith / Mary Sherman7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCindy Bunce / Cheryl Morgenstein vs Marta Keyser / Patti Hulbert6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKimberlei Gill / Lisa Mason vs Sue Leitch / Elizabeth Eubanks6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-12vs PW.NeighborsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelli Harris / Peggy Dobbins vs Jennifer Smith / Erin Nelson7-6, 6-4
2026-03-10vs BENT.FordWon 30
W#1 DoublesHanna Sturgis / Donna Lee vs Tracy Jones / Nancy Findley6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Finn / Myra Peterson vs Jeannine McClung / Sonia Weber2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBetsy Terjesen / Kimberlei Gill vs Mary Jo Ford / Jacquelyn Raynor6-1, 6-1
2026-03-03vs TOC.CardellaWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberlei Gill / Peggy Dobbins vs Jill Cardella / Janet Constantino3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Mason / Louise Hutchinson vs Patricia Twomey / Debbie Zaccardelli4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Bunce / Donna Lee vs Amy Demsko / Susan Bowers6-3, 6-3
2026-02-24vs TOC.ButlerWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Peggy Dobbins vs Sherry Hargrove / Kari Wetherall6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Mason / Myra Peterson vs Sarah Butler / Kristen Gallopo4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHanna Sturgis / Donna Lee vs Terri Whitson / Shirley Liu7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Kimberlei Gill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Hanna Sturgis
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.91
Peggy Dobbins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Suzanne Ruggles
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.88
Cindy Bunce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Louise Hutchinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Myra Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Robin Finn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Betsy Terjesen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Cheryl Morgenstein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
Lisa Mason
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberlei Gill + Louise Hutchinson9061% games+10.7% vs expected
Myra Peterson + Suzanne Ruggles7448% games−8.0% vs expected
Kimberlei Gill + Peggy Dobbins4157% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Ruggles + Betsy Terjesen3250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kimberlei Gill
255W–204L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Hanna Sturgis
81W–64L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Peggy Dobbins
53W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Suzanne Ruggles
182W–162L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Cindy Bunce
10W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Louise Hutchinson
23W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Myra Peterson
169W–141L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Robin Finn
105W–141L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Betsy Terjesen
145W–85L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cheryl Morgenstein
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Lisa Mason
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.