Teams

Boren

2026 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 40 & Over · 8.0 Adult Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-14vs BoggsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRocco Testini / Kacy Bednarz vs Camille Cruz / Ivan Acosta4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesGinger Wayland / Michael Flores vs Kelly Welch / Michael Hastings5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Boren / James Guevara vs Yograj Patel / Sarah Wakefield6-1, 7-5
2026-06-13vs RobbinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Boren / Dain Guetersloh vs John Vasquez / Lisa MacK3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Guevara / Tiffany Fioroni vs Joe Alvarez / Elvira Cruz6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Flores / Ginger Wayland vs Keith Dixon / Amanda White7-6, 7-5
2026-06-11vs RobbinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMatt Nichols / Paulette Sturdivant vs Katy Cariens / Mark Smith7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTiffany Fioroni / John Kyle Wooldridge vs Kimberly Lott / Randy Robbins7-6, 6-3
2026-06-10vs BoggsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRocco Testini / Renee Cook vs Sarah Wakefield / Gene Stickney6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDain Guetersloh / Angela Trevithick vs Camille Cruz / Stephen Dalton6-7, 2-6
2026-06-04vs RobbinsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Trevithick / James Guevara vs John Vasquez / Lisa MacK6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDain Guetersloh / Kacy Bednarz vs Joe Alvarez / Elvira Cruz4-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs BoggsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Flores / Ginger Wayland vs Camille Cruz / Stephen Dalton6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRocco Testini / Renee Cook vs Michael Hastings / Kary Callen4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPaulette Sturdivant / Matt Nichols vs Sarah Wakefield / Yograj Patel6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
James Guevara
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.83
Paulette Sturdivant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Amy Boren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Angela Trevithick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.62
Dain Guetersloh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Ginger Wayland
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Rocco Testini
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Matt Nichols
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Tiffany Fioroni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
John Chad Carter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.41
John Kyle Wooldridge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Shaunna Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Kacy Bednarz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Renee Cook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Chad Carter + Angela Trevithick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Guevara
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Paulette Sturdivant
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Amy Boren
15W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Angela Trevithick
41W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Dain Guetersloh
9W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Ginger Wayland
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Rocco Testini
10W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.59
Matt Nichols
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
Tiffany Fioroni
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
John Chad Carter
36W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
John Kyle Wooldridge
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.41
Shaunna Jensen
32W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Kacy Bednarz
19W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Renee Cook
14W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.