Teams

SDNC WC 4.5 Kit Carson/ Buggs (2:2)

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - Men - 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-27vs SDNC LLW 4.5 San Dieguito/ FrommeLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / Jeffrey Ford vs Scott Crabtree / Aran Wong3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBernie Buggs / Chad Basinger vs Chris Fromme / Christopher Arns2-6, 3-6
2022-03-06vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC/ Ishihara (2/2)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Dieter Steinmetz / Steve Firestone6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / T Solomon Liu vs Mark Ishihara / Gordon Wong6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Ray Fisher / Brian Stevens6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / Chad Basinger vs Paul Giarrusso / Robert Wild6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Tomer Yehezkel vs Wender Hwang / Norman Granger6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Ray Fisher / Brian Stevens6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Kenny Hawkins / Jerry Lu6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / Joseph King vs Steffan Dye / Raymond Herr6-3, 6-2
2022-01-16vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC/ Ishihara (2/2)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Michael Donahue / Dieter Steinmetz6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Riordan / David Jaehnig vs Jeff Speir / Jeffrey Ackley6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-09vs SDNC 4.5 Morgan Run/ Howe (2:2)Split 11
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Rick Dowe / James MacDonald6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / John Broderick vs John Glancy / Ranjit Salvi3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Bernie Buggs
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
4.19
Chad Basinger
published 4.5
4.01
David Jaehnig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Jeffrey Ford
published
John Broderick
published
Joseph Barbarie
published
T Solomon Liu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bernie Buggs
155W–51L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Chad Basinger
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
David Jaehnig
56W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.01
Jeffrey Ford
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Broderick
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Barbarie
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
T Solomon Liu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.