Teams

HRCA-S GREEN

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-03vs CCV ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Belcher / Daniel Bruetting vs Joel Aronoff / Eli Goldstein4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-08-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Guzak / Frank Johns vs Andrew Landon / Dillon Landon2-6, 2-6
2024-08-27vs RRTC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Belcher / Daniel Bruetting vs Akshay Kumar / Prasanth Nair4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJohn Guzak vs Yen-Fua Yeung1-6, 3-6
2024-08-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Bruetting / Sean Knudson vs Brian Fisher / Michael Miller6-4, 6-2
2024-08-06vs PRC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Bruetting / Sean Knudson vs John Wierzba / Eric Olsen-Dufour5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Guzak vs Sandy Wierzba3-6, 2-6
2024-07-30vs CPV GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Bruetting / Sean Knudson vs Victor Pluto / Michael Shorts7-6, 6-4
2024-07-23vs PCC YELLOWWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrandon Dale / Daniel Bruetting vs Jarrod Daddis / Joshua Daddis2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Daniel Bruetting
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
John Belcher
published
3.01
John Guzak
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Sean Knudson
published
2.89
Frank Johns
published
2.88
William Hunzicker
published
Bryan Sousa
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Guzak + Daniel Bruetting2845% games−1.2% vs expected
John Guzak + John Belcher0540% gamesnot enough data
John Belcher + Daniel Bruetting2343% gamesnot enough data
Sean Knudson + William Hunzicker134 matchesnot enough data
John Guzak + Frank Johns033 matchesnot enough data
Sean Knudson + Daniel Bruetting033 matchesnot enough data
Frank Johns + Daniel Bruetting033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Bruetting
40W–53L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
John Belcher
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
John Guzak
40W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Sean Knudson
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
Frank Johns
2W–18L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.89
William Hunzicker
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Bryan Sousa
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.