Teams

Khawam/Ironsmith

2021 Pinellas Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 MXD

8 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-21vs Pinellas - McMullen/MacCulloughLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Robert Maisner vs Clark MacCullough / Allegra Campos4-6, 4-6
2021-03-14vs Pinellas - McMullen/MacCulloughLost 01
L#1 DoublesIulian Harja / Michele Ironsmith vs Josh Melton / Gueisy Herrmann0-6, 3-6
2021-03-07vs Pinellas - McMullen/MacCulloughWon 21
W#1 DoublesJillene Davis / Robert Maisner vs Josh Melton / Teal Henderson6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLilivette Arroyo / Dane Houston vs Allegra Campos / William Zeedyk5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Iulian Harja vs Kim Cashman-King / David King3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-02-07vs Pinellas - McMullen/MacCulloughLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Maisner / Kirsten Willis vs Karen Olson / Josh Melton3-6, 2-6
2021-01-31vs Pinellas - McMullen/MacCulloughWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Robert Maisner vs Mike Moenter / Avery Zercoe7-6, 7-6
2021-01-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDane Houston / Lilivette Arroyo vs Craig Hajdich / Karen Olson1-6, 4-6
2021-01-17vs Pinellas - McMullen/MacCulloughLost 02
L#2 DoublesIulian Harja / Michele Ironsmith vs Craig Hajdich / Karen Olson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRena Khawam / Robert Maisner vs Teal Henderson / Josh Melton7-6, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MXD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Michele Ironsmith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.35
Hector Arroyo
published 4.5
4.34
Lilivette Arroyo
published 4.5
3.90
Kirsten Willis
published
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
Jillene Davis
published
Rena Khawam
published
Robert Maisner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirsten Willis + Dane Houston134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
4.51
4.5
Hector Arroyo
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Lilivette Arroyo
50W–36L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
4.34
Kirsten Willis
10W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 8 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rena Khawam
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Maisner
59W–49L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.