Teams

SFV - Skort Squad

2025 Adult 40+ Weekday SFV · SFV 40+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-28vs SFV - Sets In The City 3.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesKimberley Walker / Maryann Brandon vs Kristine Puno / Sara Gabriel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNataliya Padilla / Margie Englis vs Peggy Perazzo / Tracy Kuncar3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesPamela Girard / Nataliya Padilla vs Laura Leff / Lisa Cloughesy2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaryann Brandon / Margie Englis vs Robin Page / Dawn Bregman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-06vs SFV - FireballsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShannon Malik / Ki Hyun Park vs Nicole Martino / Arianne Rudes2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNataliya Padilla / Tracy Levine vs Cindy Gaytan / Margery Teller7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-28vs SFV - Spin DivasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaryann Brandon / Ayuko Siegel vs Michele Venegas / Lisa Gubicza4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLeslie Giammanco / Nataliya Padilla vs Susan Goss / Nichole Burston6-2, 6-3
2025-02-27vs SFV - Love GamesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaryann Brandon / Pamela Girard vs Esther Hwang / Susan Lee0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMargie Englis vs Caroline Wong6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoy Cho / Leslie Giammanco vs Andrea Kinloch / Erin Mand3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesYoko Kanayama / Maryann Brandon vs Betty Shalom / Ellen Plummer1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKi Hyun Park / Shannon Malik vs Samira Sizdahkhani / Amelia Stephenson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNataliya Padilla / Andrea Hutchman vs Vanessa Rodriguez / Jo Ann Thrailkill0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-23vs SFV - String TheoryWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaryann Brandon / Kimberley Walker vs Connie Benveniste / Susan Schechter6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMargie Englis vs Lindsay Ignatczyk6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Levine / Nataliya Padilla vs Hope Jones / Fran Prange6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Christine Russell
published 3.5
3.45
Shannon Malik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Ki Hyun Park
published
3.36
Margie Englis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Joy Cho
published
3.26
Helle Hegelund
published 3.5
3.17
Jasmin Miller
published
3.17
Nataliya Padilla
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Ayuko Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberley Walker
published
3.16
Carrie Gasper
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Yoko Kanayama
published
3.14
Joanna Gardner
published
3.10
Leslie Giammanco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Pamela Girard
published
3.05
Tracy Levine
published
3.03
Andrea Hutchman
published 3.5
2.94
Maryann Brandon
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.89
Simone Friedman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Cho + Jasmin Miller9359% games+5.5% vs expected
Shannon Malik + Ki Hyun Park3260% games+1.0% vs expected
Maryann Brandon + Ayuko Siegel5654% gamesnot enough data
Maryann Brandon + Nataliya Padilla2542% gamesnot enough data
Nataliya Padilla + Ayuko Siegel4173% gamesnot enough data
Maryann Brandon + Carrie Gasper314 matchesnot enough data
Simone Friedman + Tracy Levine044 matchesnot enough data
Margie Englis + Christine Russell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Russell
51W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Shannon Malik
92W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Ki Hyun Park
17W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Joy Cho
37W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Helle Hegelund
8W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Jasmin Miller
27W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Nataliya Padilla
60W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Ayuko Siegel
64W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Kimberley Walker
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Carrie Gasper
189W–211L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Yoko Kanayama
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Joanna Gardner
29W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
3.5
Leslie Giammanco
88W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
Pamela Girard
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tracy Levine
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Andrea Hutchman
3W–14L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Maryann Brandon
94W–139L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Simone Friedman
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.