Teams

JLocke/MMcKinstry (Raintree)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Mon AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-04-28vs CChildress (Matthews)Split 11
W#2 DoublesJanet Locke / Daphne Katz vs Stephanie Meadow / Jennifer Smith6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Anthony / Thanh Nga McIver vs Carol Childress / Liza Branch3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-21vs DGasparro (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Donohue / Emily van Dixhoorn vs Barb Marthinsen / Danna Jean Pompeo4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLynne Schachte / Suzy Owens vs Cheri King / Janet Garvey3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Locke / Barbara Chase vs Marie Yaconetti / Lisa Kachulis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-14vs KFoster (WSRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Anthony / Daphne Katz vs Sally Davidson / Catherine Rousseaux5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzy Owens / Thanh Nga McIver vs Kathy King / Julie Smallwood6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaria McKinstry / Theresa Nobles vs Yvette Gama / Chris Marko4-6, 1-6
2025-04-07vs JLundberg (Palisades)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDaphne Katz / Theresa Nobles vs Lori Bowers / Bonnie Champion3-6, 1-6
2025-04-03vs CChildress (Matthews)Split 11
W#1 DoublesEmily van Dixhoorn / Eileen Donohue vs Carol Childress / Janet Baker4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTheresa Nobles / Thanh Nga McIver vs Paula Donoghue / Donna Musante0-6, 2-6
2025-03-31vs CHelms (Lifetime)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDaphne Katz / Susan Anthony vs Elena Donaldson / Jennifer Haahs1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Nobles / Janis Behymer vs Daniela Pagano / Sara Benedict3-6, 2-6
2025-03-17vs DGasparro (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Locke / Eileen Donohue vs Janet Garvey / Kristen Lyons6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Anthony / Lynne Schachte vs Barb Marthinsen / Terri Kimner7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2025-03-10vs KFoster (WSRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEmily van Dixhoorn / Lynne Schachte vs Jill Fritz / Sharon Cranford6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Anthony / Daphne Katz vs Kathy King / Chris Marko6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanis Behymer / Theresa Nobles vs Julie Smallwood / Sally Davidson0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-03vs JLundberg (Palisades)Won 21
L#1 DoublesLynne Schachte / Thanh Nga McIver vs Kimberly Burkhamer / Shirley Stoltenberg0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Locke / Maria McKinstry vs Bonnie Champion / Madlen Barnett6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTheresa Nobles / Daphne Katz vs Joy Landesman / Sandra Stowe6-2, 6-2
2025-02-24vs CHelms (Lifetime)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLynne Schachte / Suzy Owens vs Christina Peterson / Julie Williams3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria McKinstry / Janet Locke vs Elena Donaldson / Brenda Sweeney3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesThanh Nga McIver / Janis Behymer vs Daniela Pagano / Sara Benedict1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Emily van Dixhoorn
published
3.68
Barbara Chase
published 4
3.55
Eileen Donohue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Janet Locke
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Lynne Schachte
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.47
Suzy Owens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Maria McKinstry
published
3.40
Daphne Katz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Theresa Nobles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Janis Behymer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Sybil Cioffi
published 3.5
3.19
Thanh Nga McIver
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Nobles + Janet Locke8356% games−0.4% vs expected
Theresa Nobles + Daphne Katz5846% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Nobles + Janis Behymer3449% gamesnot enough data
Janis Behymer + Janet Locke2541% gamesnot enough data
Daphne Katz + Janet Locke4256% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Nobles + Suzy Owens2349% gamesnot enough data
Eileen Donohue + Janet Locke224 matchesnot enough data
Maria McKinstry + Janet Locke044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily van Dixhoorn
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Barbara Chase
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Eileen Donohue
45W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Janet Locke
46W–68L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Lynne Schachte
20W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Suzy Owens
18W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Maria McKinstry
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Daphne Katz
24W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Theresa Nobles
31W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Janis Behymer
36W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Sybil Cioffi
28W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Thanh Nga McIver
46W–75L career · 9 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.