Teams

Raintree Stahling

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-22vs HCC StinsonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Moncure vs Susan Poulos3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Boschen / Peggy Bryan vs Jennifer Leon / Cameron Sealey7-6, 6-4
2023-07-21vs ACAC Cheatham / HoeferLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Lisa Penny vs Katherine Guerette / Trisha Smith7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-07-05vs SCC TotaroLost 02
L#1 DoublesPam Koch / Carolyn Moncure vs Heather Benedetti / Kristin Kim2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Boschen / Kerry Kablack vs Dorothy Hillgrove / Annmarie Strachan4-6, 3-6
2023-06-30vs ACAC JonesWon 10
W#3 DoublesPeggy Bryan / Amy Boschen vs Anne Townsend / Kim Martin6-3, 6-3
2023-06-28vs Stonehenge BullWon 10
W#1 DoublesPam Koch / Carolyn Moncure vs Linda Larue / Karen Grimes1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-25vs MTC HilbertLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Portanova / Carolyn Moncure vs Olena Turner / Kati Shick6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Carolyn Moncure
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Rebecca Schwartz
published
3.18
Megan Lloyd
published
3.15
Lisa Penny
published
3.09
Barbara Portanova
published 3.5
3.03
Mona Stahling
published
3.00
Peggy Bryan
published
2.88
Amy Boschen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Pam Koch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mona Stahling + Lisa Penny123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Penny + Carolyn Moncure123 matchesnot enough data
Peggy Bryan + Amy Boschen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolyn Moncure
43W–66L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Rebecca Schwartz
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Megan Lloyd
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Lisa Penny
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Barbara Portanova
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
Peggy Bryan
28W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Amy Boschen
154W–164L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.