Teams

GOOTEE/18/5.5/NOD/MCC

2025 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 2.92 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-29vs Kazik/Wise/40/5.5/NOD/GACCWon 30
W#1 DoublesNoreen Bonifacic / Rebecca Boudreaux vs TIMMY VERNIER / Rachael Spencer6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTania Giambrone / Kristin Offner vs Vanessa Gehring / EVE KAZIK4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca DeVerges / Lauren Schonekas vs Connie Wise / Theresa Bonin7-5, 7-6
2025-09-09vs DUNN/HOLMES/18/5.5/NOD/NOCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Wild / Katie Impastato vs Louise Smallpage / Katie Key6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBridget Senner / Lauren Schonekas vs Melyne Holmes / Casey Zainey7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristina Delucca / Nicole Labadot vs Joanie Huger / Natalie Erwin6-4, 6-3
2025-08-26vs Barrington/18/5.5/NOD/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesNoreen Bonifacic / Christina Delucca vs Lindsay Yenni / Nicki Barrington6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Gootee / Tania Giambrone vs Libby Fein / Lauren Ponstein6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Impastato / Ann Jackson vs Ashley Bowman / Amy Perry6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Ashley Eaton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Ashley Gootee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
Catherine Hollander
published 2.5
2.98
Kathryn Wild
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.96
Tania Giambrone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Rebecca DeVerges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Kristin Offner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Bridget Senner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Rebecca Boudreaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Ann Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Lauren Schonekas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Christina Delucca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.44
Katie Impastato
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.25
Molly Sikes
published
Laura Loftus
published
Nicole Labadot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Noreen Bonifacic
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Gootee + Ashley Eaton7078% games+17.1% vs expected
Tania Giambrone + Kristin Offner404 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Gootee + Tania Giambrone303 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca DeVerges + Lauren Schonekas303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Impastato + Christina Delucca213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Eaton
34W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Ashley Gootee
26W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
2.5
Catherine Hollander
5W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.02
Kathryn Wild
28W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Tania Giambrone
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Rebecca DeVerges
7W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
0%4%96%
2.75
Kristin Offner
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Bridget Senner
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Rebecca Boudreaux
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Ann Jackson
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Lauren Schonekas
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
2.5
Christina Delucca
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Katie Impastato
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
Molly Sikes
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Laura Loftus
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Labadot
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Noreen Bonifacic
10W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.