Teams

Woodside - Hodges

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '25 · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-23vs CSRATA Ellen HarperLost 02
L#2 DoublesAngela Hodges / Kari DeLoach vs Dori Cash / Taylor Childress6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Tiffany / Nicole Hillman vs Connie Richards / Tonya Porter0-6, 1-6
2025-03-02vs RVP - JohnsonLost 04
L#1 DoublesLaura Donatelli / Melissa Bunney vs Jaclyn Bohanan / Hannah Corbitt3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAngela Hodges vs Emily John4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Osbon / Kari DeLoach vs Ashley Johnson / Jennifer Peters2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPaige Tiffany vs Jeanette Pellot0-6, 2-6
2025-02-23vs West Lake - SmithWon 21
L#1 SinglesPaige Tiffany vs Kari Jones2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKari DeLoach vs Brianna Patel6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngela Hodges / Michelle Schweizer vs Sheila Kamath / Karen Glass6-1, 6-2
2025-02-16vs RVP - BaldyWon 21
L#1 SinglesAngela Hodges vs Alexis Shaefer4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Osbon / Kari DeLoach vs Kristen Williams / Melisa DeAngel6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPaige Rabon / Michelle Schweizer vs Melinda Cato / Rachel McFatridge6-4, 7-6
2025-02-02vs CCRC - LesieurWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Donatelli / Angie Osbon vs Kerri Rainey / Qingdan Wu6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAngela Hodges / Paige Rabon vs Kristi Crowder / Barbara Temin6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPaige Tiffany / Nicole Hillman vs Katie Vargas / Jane Miller6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-01vs CCRC - AndersonLost 23
L#1 DoublesAngie Osbon / Vickie Brown vs Beth Esposito / Felicia Clausen7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAngela Hodges vs AnnieB Brown1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaige Rabon / Michelle Schweizer vs Russul Abbas / Samantha Sundborg6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesNicole Hillman vs Shanice Anderson2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPaige Tiffany / Kari DeLoach vs April Ewing / Katherine Sherrod6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Sharon DeHart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Kari DeLoach
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.87
Angie Osbon
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Melissa Bunney
usually #4 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
2.68
Angela Hodges
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Vickie Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Michelle Schweizer
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
2.61
Melissa Lackey-Oremus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Paige Tiffany
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.45
Paige Rabon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Bushnell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Laura Donatelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Hillman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Osbon + Melissa Bunney3253% games+4.4% vs expected
Angie Osbon + Kari DeLoach314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Bushnell + Melissa Bunney134 matchesnot enough data
Kari DeLoach + Michelle Schweizer303 matchesnot enough data
Kari DeLoach + Paige Tiffany303 matchesnot enough data
Vickie Brown + Paige Tiffany123 matchesnot enough data
Paige Rabon + Michelle Schweizer213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Schweizer + Paige Tiffany123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon DeHart
38W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kari DeLoach
21W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Angie Osbon
28W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Melissa Bunney
45W–56L career · 11 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Angela Hodges
4W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Vickie Brown
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Michelle Schweizer
28W–35L career · 10 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Melissa Lackey-Oremus
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Paige Tiffany
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Paige Rabon
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Elizabeth Bushnell
5W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Donatelli
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Hillman
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.