Teams

Ft Gatlin-Agee

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Combo 18 & Over- SUMMER Night · 8.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-18vs Ft Gatlin-RemingtonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDarian Banks / Christopher Lamb vs Michael Thomas / Griff Salmon4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDelvin Grant / Guilherme Valle vs Fredrik Andersson / Eric Acosta1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-04vs Ft Gatlin-RemingtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesGuilherme Valle / Jose Villacis vs Kenton Wu / CARLOS GUERRERO7-5, 6-4
2025-07-24vs Orange/PhanLost 02
L#1 DoublesJose Villacis / Darian Banks vs Juan Carlos Rotjes / Sebastian Rubio3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDelvin Grant / Daniel Motta vs Asher Roddy / Sebastian Laguillo1-6, 1-6
2025-06-26vs Lake Cane-MongeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDarian Banks / Daniel Motta vs Fabricio Correa / Davi Saidler2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnthony Agee / Jose Villacis vs Ernesto Gonzalez / Giovanni Munno3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-19vs Orange/PhanLost 12
W#1 DoublesBlake Bartos / Christopher Lamb vs Chevaughn Crawford / Francisco Albornoz3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDelvin Grant / Andrew Green vs Gustavo Castro / Sebastian Rubio4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Agee / Craig Cimring vs Gowtham Shanmugam / Juan Carlos Rotjes1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Motta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Christopher Lamb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Blake Bartos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Darian Banks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Anthony Agee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Guilherme Valle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Delvin Grant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Craig Cimring
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jose Villacis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Pasquale Fortunato
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Motta
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Lamb
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.96
4
Blake Bartos
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Darian Banks
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Anthony Agee
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Guilherme Valle
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Delvin Grant
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Craig Cimring
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jose Villacis
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pasquale Fortunato
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.