Teams

Yadkin/Burkhalter/18+3.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men-Thursday (night)

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-01vs Coordinator/Club TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesLogan Caldwell / Chris Blankenship vs Austin Temple / Preston Barber6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJoseph Kulits vs Vance Faulkner6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTL Brown vs Lyle Paukner6-3, 6-2
2025-04-23vs Coordinator/Club TeamWon 31
W#1 DoublesChris Blankenship / Dean Burkhalter vs Austin Temple / Brad Helms6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTL Brown vs Vance Faulkner3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMatt Crews / Alex Djuro vs Lyle Paukner / John Wilson6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNeil Bishop vs Bradin Routh4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-20vs Coordinator/Club TeamWon 41
W#1 DoublesChris Blankenship / Logan Caldwell vs Bradin Routh / Lyle Paukner6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJoseph Kulits vs Vance Faulkner6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMatt Crews / Andrew Darcy vs Michael Fulks / Austin Temple0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTL Brown vs Matthias Von Feilitzsch6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Djuro / Daniel Alvarez vs Preston Barber / Logan Shuping6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men-Thursday (night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Joseph Kulits
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.49
Logan Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Dean Burkhalter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Matt Crews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Alex Djuro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Andrew Darcy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Justin Hammonds
published
Neil Bishop
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
TL Brown
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Logan Caldwell + Matt Crews213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Kulits
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Logan Caldwell
29W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Dean Burkhalter
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Matt Crews
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alex Djuro
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Andrew Darcy
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Justin Hammonds
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Neil Bishop
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
TL Brown
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.