Teams

Montesi Yates - Pinehurst Resort

2025 Sandhills Adult 55 & over · 3.0 Senior Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-30vs Jones - MazarickWon 10
W#2 DoublesJamie Moss / Sondra Montesi Yates vs Hannah Ha / Angela Daniel7-6, 7-5
2025-04-23vs Haugh - Highland Country ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesSondra Montesi Yates / Jamie Moss vs Laura Monroe / Martha Lerario7-6, 7-5
2025-04-02vs Haugh - Highland Country ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesSondra Montesi Yates / Jamie Moss vs Murtis Worth / Laurie Cherry6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-19vs Jones - MazarickSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJamie Moss / Anne Weiss vs Peggy Schaefer / Hannah Ha6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Rader / Sondra Montesi Yates vs Jacqui Cannon / Jackie Foley6-3, 6-4
2025-03-12vs Haugh - Highland Country ClubWon 10
W#3 DoublesSondra Montesi Yates / Jamie Moss vs Laura Monroe / Martha Lerario6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Haugh - Highland Country ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesSondra Montesi Yates / Jamie Moss vs Corinna Williamson / Sharon Williford4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-26vs Jones - MazarickWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Rader / Sondra Montesi Yates vs Betty Peterson / Mari Lesniak6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Senior Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Sondra Montesi Yates
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.90
Kelly Rader
published
Anne Weiss
published 3
2.64
Jamie Moss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.39
Vilma Mendez
published
2.33
Kimberly Maloney
published
Marianna Singer
published
Maya Callaghan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Moss + Sondra Montesi Yates101446% games+5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sondra Montesi Yates
43W–75L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kelly Rader
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Anne Weiss
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Jamie Moss
34W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Vilma Mendez
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Kimberly Maloney
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Marianna Singer
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maya Callaghan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.