Teams

NWO 40&Over 7.0Mx Morse -Launchpad

2022 NWO Mixed 40 & Over · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-02-27vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mx Smith -PTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Connelly Jr / Hallie Williams vs Hyeyoung Bang / Bruce Collet6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteve Nixon / Kim Sofo vs Mike Bielefeld / Wanda Augsburger6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrad Tyo / Tracy Tyo vs Cynthia Okin / Jim Augsburger3-6, 4-6
2022-02-13vs NWO 40&Over 7.0Mx French PTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesHallie Williams / William Connelly Jr vs Bob Kolvey / Ani Gonzales6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTrevor Bruning / Mary Morrison vs Tim Laird / Sara Theis2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrad Tyo / Tracy Tyo vs Elena Duval / John Cronin6-7, 1-3
2022-02-06vs NWO 40&Over 7.0Mx Bloomquist/NausLost 12
L#1 DoublesTrevor Bruning / Tracy Tyo vs Lisa Baer-Dewhirst / Steven Eilert1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Janes / Susan Wilson vs Joey Martin / Jessica Gralak6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesWilliam Connelly Jr / Hallie Williams vs Michael Barnett / Rachel Barnett3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-01-16vs NWO 40&Over 7.0Mx JacobsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Janes / Kim Sofo vs Mike Lyon / Shari Duckett4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteve Nixon / Susan Wilson vs Matthew Haschak / Tina Reinbolt2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWilliam Connelly Jr / Hallie Williams vs James Jacobs / Mary Ann Holmes7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Andrew Janes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Thedore Morse
published 4
3.58
Steve Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Hallie Williams
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.25
Brenda Rafac
published 3.5
3.22
Trevor Bruning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Kim Sofo
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
Tracy Tyo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Teri Hagemeyer
published
Brad Tyo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leigh Harders
published
Mary Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
William Connelly Jr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hallie Williams + William Connelly Jr224 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Tyo + Trevor Bruning033 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Tyo + Brad Tyo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Janes
139W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Thedore Morse
132W–139L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Steve Nixon
254W–160L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Hallie Williams
132W–82L career · 9 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Brenda Rafac
85W–72L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Trevor Bruning
23W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Kim Sofo
75W–78L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Tracy Tyo
69W–82L career · 3 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Teri Hagemeyer
21W–31L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.83
Brad Tyo
0W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leigh Harders
25W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Morrison
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Connelly Jr
64W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.