Teams

C6 SCC Schwartz

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Jessica Steinour vs Emma Moredock / Haidee Cline1-6, 0-6
2023-06-03vs C7 Southampton BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Jessica Steinour vs Alice Ulrichs / Beth Stafford1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-29vs C2 Bon Air BalsamoWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Jessica Steinour vs Robin Balsamo / Janet Miller6-2, 6-4
2023-04-22vs C7 Southampton BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Jessica Steinour vs Beth Morris / Laurie Huizenga3-6, 4-6
2023-04-15vs C5 Burkwood ClarkLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Stacey Gray vs Donna Mourtzakis / Cynthia Dunivan2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-04-02vs C3 ACAC PfeifferLost 01
L#2 DoublesStacey Gray / Cheryl Cacciotti vs Nikki Callaghan / Erika King3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Laney Hyatt
published
3.45
Catherine Baldridge
published 3.5
3.42
Morgan Schwartz
published
3.40
Becky McNeer
published 3.5
3.33
Stacey Gray
published
3.30
Colleen Weisiger
published 3.5
3.17
Donna Jamison
published
3.15
Carla Shaffer
published 3.5
3.06
Cheryl Cacciotti
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Jessica Steinour
published
3.05
Annmarie Strachan
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky McNeer + Donna Jamison5161% games+12.5% vs expected
Stacey Gray + Morgan Schwartz5353% games+5.1% vs expected
Stacey Gray + Colleen Weisiger314 matchesnot enough data
Becky McNeer + Catherine Baldridge123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laney Hyatt
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
3.5
Catherine Baldridge
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
Morgan Schwartz
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Becky McNeer
29W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Stacey Gray
21W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Colleen Weisiger
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Donna Jamison
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Carla Shaffer
22W–30L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Cheryl Cacciotti
67W–85L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
Jessica Steinour
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Annmarie Strachan
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.