Teams

LEBTC BLACK

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-07vs SSHP ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesTanya Koch / Meghan Page vs Nancy Railey-Borchelt / Natalie Borchelt7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKristina Schomer vs Toni Lapp2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Crawley / Sarah Nelson vs Nancy Hogue / Maureen Mallon6-0, 6-0
2022-08-31vs LTFC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Tanya Koch vs Kathy Hoskins / Erin Broerman6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKristina Schomer vs Tiffany Cholez6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristen Swenson / Mary Bakken vs Kelly Kliner / Sarah Hughes6-3, 6-3
2022-08-24vs BM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTanya Koch / Kelly Crawley vs Kimberly Picchietti / Neha Sitole6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMeghan Page / Kristen Swenson vs Beth Hoffman / Laura Yetzer6-3, 6-2
2022-08-17vs HW REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Kristen Swenson vs Brianna Gass / Sandi Bozanic6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKristina Schomer vs Laurie McElroy6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMeghan Page / Mary Bakken vs Ashley Pennick / Jessica Stretz Storm7-6, 6-0
2022-08-10vs SSD BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Swenson / Tanya Koch vs Allie Donnenfeld / Jessica Jones6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMeghan Page / Mary Bakken vs Phuong Banh / Amy Dodds7-5, 6-2
2022-08-03vs KC ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Sarah Nelson vs Ashley Barto / Cheryl Amador6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKristina Schomer vs Jennifer Gonyea5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeghan Page / Laurien Hottman vs Lay Chan / Sara Lynn6-2, 6-1
2022-07-27vs KC TEALWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaurien Hottman / Kristen Swenson vs Holly Sharpeta / Cathy Welch5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesKristina Schomer vs Amy Shaw7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Nelson / Meghan Page vs Kathy Owens / Erica Smith6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Laurien Hottman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Kelly Crawley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Kristen Swenson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.37
Tanya Koch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Mary Bakken
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Meghan Page
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Kristina Schomer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Koch + Kelly Crawley13461% games+8.8% vs expected
Tanya Koch + Laurien Hottman7164% games+7.4% vs expected
Kristen Swenson + Laurien Hottman18563% games+6.6% vs expected
Meghan Page + Laurien Hottman4170% games+6.6% vs expected
Mary Bakken + Meghan Page18262% games+5.9% vs expected
Meghan Page + Tanya Koch7264% games+5.7% vs expected
Laurien Hottman + Kelly Crawley11261% games+3.5% vs expected
Kristen Swenson + Tanya Koch4264% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laurien Hottman
175W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Kelly Crawley
137W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Kristen Swenson
78W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Tanya Koch
55W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Mary Bakken
42W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Meghan Page
95W–88L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Kristina Schomer
39W–11L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.