Teams

CCM - Sand

2026 Adult 18 & Over Women Winter Night - Mobile · 2.5 Women Winter Night 18+

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-02-21vs MTC - JohnsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmma Munderloh / Caroline McGugin vs Kathy Belter / Wanda Johnson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLizzie Meacham vs Megan Jordan1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlexis Allen / Courtney Kelly vs Sara Barks / Daly Pollman0-6, 3-6
2026-01-28vs MO - Kennedy 2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKatelyn Parnell / Terrell Ewing vs Amanda Montz / Abigail Sherman5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline McGugin vs Lauren Latham0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRyane Fulgham / Lily Padgett vs Danielle Williams / Karen Campbell1-6, 2-6
2026-01-21vs MTC - Pitts/HallLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Sand / Lizzie Meacham vs Olivia Hammond / JAZZ PIERCE3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline McGugin vs Monica Cook2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEmma Munderloh / Courtney Kelly vs Lindsey Baker / Shonnda Smith0-6, 1-6
2026-01-15vs Spirit Park - Baker -NWon 21
W#1 DoublesTerrell Ewing / Lizzie Meacham vs Amanda Calhoun / Stephanie Bell6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJamie Flotte vs Madison Monk6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCourtney Kelly / Caroline McGugin vs Jennifer Kuba / Hannah Broich0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Winter Night 18+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Lizzie Meacham
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.40
Jamie Flotte
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.31
Terrell Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alexis Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Anna Gonzales
published 2.5
2.18
Ryane Fulgham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Katelyn Parnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.02
Caroline McGugin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.91
Julianne Montgomery
published
1.85
Lily Padgett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.84
Anne Sand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.81
Emma Munderloh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jaclyn Kilduff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Sand + Jamie Flotte033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lizzie Meacham
9W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
Jamie Flotte
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Terrell Ewing
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Alexis Allen
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Anna Gonzales
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryane Fulgham
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Katelyn Parnell
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Caroline McGugin
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Julianne Montgomery
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Lily Padgett
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
2.5
Anne Sand
3W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Emma Munderloh
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Jaclyn Kilduff
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Candace Vegliacich
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.