Teams

Jo.Nance40M

2024 Capital Mixed 40 & Over · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-28vs La.Holderness40MWon 20
W#1 DoublesBobby Hammond / Lauren Redmond vs Bruce Farrell / Melissa Proctor6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJames Reardon / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Shannon Fuller / Dan Rea7-5, 6-2
2024-07-24vs Ma.Morriston40MWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Ross / Ana Maria Allessi vs Courtney Carey / Dwayne Deloatch6-1, 6-3
2024-07-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Hobbs / Bobby Hammond vs Bryan Kearney / Ngoc Tran6-4, 6-1
2024-06-27vs Pa.Alford40MLost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Redmond / Bobby Hammond vs Paige Alford / Travis Salts5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Reardon / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Jaime Clark / Josh Hastings4-6, 2-6
2024-06-20vs St.King40MWon 20
W#1 DoublesBobby Hammond / Lauren Redmond vs Samantha Pickett / Brian Pickett7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Reardon / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Jason Grieco / Kelly Thompson6-1, 6-4
2024-05-30vs Ka.Wahle40MWon 10
W#1 DoublesBobby Hammond / Ana Maria Allessi vs Jakob Helleryd / Karen Wahle6-1, 6-3
2024-05-25vs Pa.Spell40MLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurene Fitzgerald / Kurt Holmberg vs Pamela Spell / John Hoomani4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Amy Hobbs
published 3.5
3.28
Lauren Redmond
published
3.09
Brian Ross
published 3
3.05
Abigail Weaver
published 3
2.93
Bobby Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Dawn Johnstone
published 3
2.73
John Underhill
published
2.69
Dora Reed
published
2.68
Ana Maria Allessi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Joel Nance
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Maria Allessi + Bobby Hammond4161% gamesnot enough data
Joel Nance + Dawn Johnstone224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Hobbs
52W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Lauren Redmond
22W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
3
Brian Ross
32W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Abigail Weaver
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Bobby Hammond
90W–87L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Dawn Johnstone
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Kristin Blankenhorn Tharpe
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
John Underhill
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Dora Reed
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Ana Maria Allessi
80W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Joel Nance
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.