Teams

SS-H GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-01vs HV REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSherry Ray / Donna Moshonas vs Susan Payne / Wendy Stookesberry6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMais Ashkar vs Kellina Flansburg4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Matheson / Jennifer Price vs Laura Conry / Laurie Korff6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-21vs EM YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Moshonas / Jennifer Matheson vs Tracy Pike / Jenny Willits6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMais Ashkar vs Amy Borman6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSuzette Calvillo / Rebecca Powell vs Ann Erb / Barb Lindvall7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-19vs VC TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesSherry Ray / Jennifer Matheson vs Traci Samaras / Nancy Fridstein6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMais Ashkar vs Meridith Burrows6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Powell / Suzette Calvillo vs Vineeta Laxminarayan / Rachel Laskoski3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-07vs SS-D BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Matheson / Donna Moshonas vs Evyan Maniatis / Emily Maxfield4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSherry Ray vs Carina Clancy5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuzette Calvillo / Jennifer Price vs Jill Ellsworth / Haley Evans7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-30vs HW REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSherry Ray / Jennifer Matheson vs Tia Carroll / Nycole Walling4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Price / Suzette Calvillo vs Emily Holmes / Patrice Langdon3-6, 4-6
2025-04-27vs EM YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzette Calvillo / Mais Ashkar vs Barb Lindvall / Cynthia Mejia0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSherry Ray vs Jenny Willits2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Powell / Donna Moshonas vs Amy Borman / Tracy Pike4-6, 4-6
2025-04-23vs HV REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Moshonas / Sherry Ray vs Susan Payne / Wendy Stookesberry6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRebecca Powell / Suzette Calvillo vs Melissa Easterly / Kristin Schulte6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings49 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KC-RH BLACK7028720254
2CHCC BLUE61251025244
3PRC BLUE5226926288
4WP GOLD52221330265
5DCC GREEN52231230275
6BCC BLUE52221332283
7WP SILVER52211432291
8HG TEAL52211433267
9PH NAVY52211433287
10GR NAVY52221334309
11HRCA-N GREEN52201535306
12HIW RED52201535314
13CP GOLD52201537307
14SS-HP PURPLE42161429249
15BTA-IBM YELLOW43211431281
16CP ORANGE43191633286
17KC-RH PINK43201534313
18LTC-M GREEN43181735288
19MEA GOLD43181739310
20HRCA-N ORANGE43171840296
21HW BLUE43181741316
22BCC RED43152043317
23HFII GREEN43171845352
24CVTA YELLOW34201536307
25CACM TEAL34191637301
26HRCA-S YELLOW34181738309
27PCC PURPLE34181738296
28HW TEAL34191639310
29ATC RED34171840305
30SS-LT ORANGE34181740327
31GTC PURPLE34152044314
32CP RED34171844324
33BTA-C RED34171844340
34KC-CC BLUE34152045345
35PTC PINK34152045344
36SKY ORANGE34152046325
37DTC PURPLE25161943325
38SS-H GREEN25152044309
39MEA PINK25122349352
40PCC GREEN25122351367
41BRMST PINK25112452353
42GCC NAVY16122350356
43SS-HP RED1692654370
44SS-LGT BLACK0682247329
45CP YELLOW07132249351
46PCRK RED07112454368
47CVTA GREEN0782756378
48LTC-M BLUE0782756373
49MVCC RED0753064400

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.34
Jennifer Matheson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.31
Sherry Ray
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Donna Moshonas
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.25
Suzette Calvillo
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.17
Mais Ashkar
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.13
Rebecca Powell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Ray + Suzette Calvillo4168% games+21.3% vs expected
Jennifer Matheson + Sherry Ray5162% games+12.9% vs expected
Rebecca Powell + Jennifer Matheson6850% games+11.3% vs expected
Sherry Ray + Donna Moshonas101053% games+5.9% vs expected
Rebecca Powell + Suzette Calvillo8357% games+2.9% vs expected
Jennifer Matheson + Donna Moshonas3451% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Matheson
34W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Sherry Ray
33W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.31
2.5
Donna Moshonas
16W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Suzette Calvillo
37W–70L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Mais Ashkar
14W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Rebecca Powell
21W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.