Teams

AStein (Ballantyne CC)

2022 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Mixed 8.0 - Thurs PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-10vs BMo (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKimberly Guth / David Guth vs Russell Williams / Bilan Mo1-6, 5-7
2022-07-28vs KBombien/MGriffey WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Wade / Kimberly Guth vs Mark Griffey / Kristy Brannock2-6, 1-6
2022-07-21vs DPagano (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Wade / Wendy Lutgring vs Ashwin Dhurve / Tammy Ramsay3-6, 3-6
2022-07-06vs HPhelps (Firethorne)Won 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Wade / Wendi Young vs Jim Malseed / Holly Bandel6-4, 7-6
2022-06-30vs THolwager/CHelms (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Wade / Wendy Lutgring vs Krista Reardon / Charles Manning6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2022-06-09vs WParker/OPunjabi (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKevin Sferro / Kimberly Guth vs Sean Fox / Xersalyn Threet4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Fain / Wendi Young vs Darnaye Black / Wendy Parker3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 8.0 - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Ami Stein
published 4
3.77
Christopher Fain
published 4
Doug Derrington
published 4
3.74
Christine Wade
published 4
3.70
Anne Bradford
published 4
3.57
Kimberly Guth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Wendi Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Angie Brogdon
published 3.5
3.37
Wendy Lutgring
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Anish Patel
published 3.5
Janet Derrington
published
Kevin Sferro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Guth + Anish Patel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ami Stein
110W–102L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Christopher Fain
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Doug Derrington
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Christine Wade
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Anne Bradford
49W–32L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Kimberly Guth
91W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.57
4
Wendi Young
41W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Angie Brogdon
71W–66L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Wendy Lutgring
126W–118L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Anish Patel
2W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Janet Derrington
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Sferro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.