Teams

Leon/Huffman

2026 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W Adult 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-23vs SirianniWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Gibson / Jan Murdock vs Celeste Ivory / Alyssa Atwood6-3, 6-3
2026-03-16vs SirianniLost 01
L#3 DoublesClaire Chiara / Jan Murdock vs Alyssa Atwood / Debara Jump2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-10vs SirianniWon 10
W#2 DoublesJan Murdock / Claire Chiara vs Katie Stevens-Magler / Maryrose Sirianni7-6, 6-1
2026-03-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Gibson / Sally Davis vs Karen Agee / Kerri Foster6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-02vs O'KelleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary MacKo / Laura Gibson vs Amy Cade / Virginia Dailey6-7, 4-6
2026-02-16vs BoulosLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen Knapp / Claire Chiara vs Debbie Hall / Pauline Yearty6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-13vs BoulosLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Gibson / Mary MacKo vs Beata Ewa Los / Nada Usina6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2026-01-19vs O'KelleyWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Gibson / Jan Murdock vs Karen Devorace / Vanessa Fernandez1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Moss / Claire Chiara vs MICHELLE BEMBRY / Virginia Dailey6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Susan Ault
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Janine Thomas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Beverly Kemp
published 3
2.64
Claire Chiara
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Laura Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Jan Murdock
published
Julie Moss
published
Kristen Knapp
published
Linda Huffman
published
Mary MacKo
published
Sally Davis
published
Sharon Banasiewicz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary MacKo + Claire Chiara4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Ault
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Janine Thomas
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Beverly Kemp
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Claire Chiara
46W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Laura Gibson
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
Jan Murdock
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Moss
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Knapp
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Huffman
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary MacKo
81W–69L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Priscilla Bailey-Brown
7W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally Davis
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Banasiewicz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.