Teams

deleted to be refunded

2022 Adult 65 and Over League · Refund

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Refund
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1deleted to be refunded000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Massenburg
published 4
3.36
Diane Chaves
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Leslie Wilshusen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Jan Bryan
published 3.5
3.10
Mindy Armour
published
3.08
Linda Coleon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.85
Bethlyn Whitney
published 3
Kathleen Styer
published
Rosalie Holland
published
Susan Sato
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Wilshusen + Diane Chaves3346% games−0.2% vs expected
Linda Coleon + Susan Sato3445% gamesnot enough data
Jan Bryan + Mindy Armour3347% gamesnot enough data
Jan Bryan + Kathleen Styer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Massenburg
20W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diane Chaves
116W–106L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Leslie Wilshusen
46W–91L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Jan Bryan
51W–61L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Mindy Armour
17W–40L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Linda Coleon
66W–143L career · 5 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Bethlyn Whitney
22W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Kathleen Styer
10W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosalie Holland
6W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Sato
68W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.