Teams

Richland CC III/Walsh

MTTL · Division III

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · Division III
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hadley Park III-Blue/Pierenkemper112942357638
2Richland CC III/Walsh93723678729
3Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker946354116920
4WCPR-Grassland III/Gray675067131989
5Hillwood CC-Whitworth III21137801581105
6Wildwood III/Miller11124841571015

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Chris Mitchell
published 4.5
3.86
Jeff Gaw
published
Anthony Contaldo
published 4
Brandon Keane
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Mitchell
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.39
Jeff Gaw
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Anthony Contaldo
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Brandon Keane
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.