Teams

TN/Memphis/Ryan

2022 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Rebekah Kingsley
published
2.99
Miriam Scharf
published
2.85
Katherine Sentilles
published
2.71
Mariangeles Grear
published
2.67
Melissa Hines
published
2.45
Kathryn Lewis
published
2.37
Amber McCabe
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebekah Kingsley
14W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Miriam Scharf
25W–22L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Katherine Sentilles
37W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Erica Jancelewicz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mariangeles Grear
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Melissa Hines
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Kathryn Lewis
5W–16L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.45
2.5
Amber McCabe
15W–32L career · no lines in 2022
0%85%15%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.