Teams

NITA W 25W18b Courts Plus-Savanelli

2024 NITA2 Winter Adult 18 & Over · NITA Winter 18&Over 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesElung Pon / Emily Kurtz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-19vs NITA/A18&O 2.5W/Fallon-DelgrossoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Kurtz / Heather Smurawski vs Michelle Orr / Yumo Zou3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesStephanie Fishel vs Toto Tuo6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-14vs NITA W 25W18c Rush Copley-RyanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Leischner / Heather Smurawski vs Patricia Merriman / Alba Lane6-7, 0-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElung Pon / Emily Kurtz vs Lauren Ryan / Janet Miller6-3, 6-2
2024-04-13vs NITA/A18&O 2.5W/Fallon-DelgrossoWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicole Lintner / Jane Loeser vs Smitha Bhat / Yumo Zou6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Fishel / Elung Pon vs Hetal Dutia / Rupal Enrique6-3, 6-3
2024-03-03Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kramer / Heather Smurawski vs Katie Owens / Janet Miller4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElung Pon vs Lauren Ryan6-2, 6-2
2024-02-25vs NITA/A18&O 2.5W/Fallon-DelgrossoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElung Pon / Heather Smurawski vs Yumo Zou / Michelle Orr6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmily Kurtz / Elizabeth Monge vs Ruihong Wang / Toto Tuo0-6, 0-6
2024-02-11vs NITA/A18&O 2.5W/Fallon-DelgrossoWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Fishel / Heather Smurawski vs Hetal Dutia / Meredith Patchett6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Monge vs Olga Lis2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Kurtz / Jane Loeser vs Leeanne Warner / Smitha Bhat6-1, 6-2
2024-02-02vs NITA W 25W18c Rush Copley-RyanWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Fishel / Emily Kurtz vs Katie Owens / Jan Moon6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNicole Lintner vs Lauren Ryan6-1, 6-0
2024-01-19vs NITA/A18&O 2.5W/Fallon-DelgrossoLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Leischner / Emily Kurtz vs Hetal Dutia / Ruihong Wang1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Monge vs Michelle Orr1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Lintner / Elung Pon vs Smitha Bhat / Olga Lis6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NITA Winter 18&Over 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA W 25W18b Courts Plus-Savanelli6318921162
2NITA/A18&O 2.5W/Fallon-Delgrosso64181225181
3NITA W 25W18c Rush Copley-Ryan2762144293

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Nicole Lintner
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Jane Loeser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Julie Leischner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Elung Pon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Heather Smurawski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Monge
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Emily Kurtz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.22
Stephanie Fishel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Julie Savanelli
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Lintner
28W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.06
Jane Loeser
42W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
Julie Leischner
29W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Elung Pon
21W–10L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Heather Smurawski
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Elizabeth Monge
0W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Emily Kurtz
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Fishel
10W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.22
Julie Savanelli
76W–55L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.