Teams

Camden Pointe (John Clancy)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 4.0 Men (Brandon McGirt)

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-06-09vs Lost Forrest (Joseph Olender)*Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrent Wagner / Bryon Stelter vs Joseph Olender / Kenny Morgan2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men (Brandon McGirt) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Bryan Jacobson
published 4
3.78
Stephen Defrancesco
published
Andrew Simmons
published 4
Brett Downey
published 4
Carson Poff
published 4
3.75
Bryon Stelter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Bill Walton
published 4
3.64
Robert Neary
published
3.63
Jacob Bush
published
3.60
Jeffrey Willingham
published
3.58
Ron Pinto
published
3.58
Michael Wills
published
3.54
Matt Burnham
published
3.53
Brent Wagner
published 4
John Clancy
published
Jonathan Nall
published
Raymond Dukes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ron Pinto + John Clancy7252% gamesnot enough data
Ron Pinto + Jeffrey Willingham2543% gamesnot enough data
Brent Wagner + Matt Burnham2444% gamesnot enough data
Brent Wagner + Michael Wills3348% gamesnot enough data
Ron Pinto + Robert Neary303 matchesnot enough data
John Clancy + Bill Walton213 matchesnot enough data
Matt Burnham + Bryan Jacobson123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Wills + Stephen Defrancesco123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Jacobson
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
Stephen Defrancesco
24W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Andrew Simmons
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Brett Downey
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Carson Poff
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Bryon Stelter
102W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Bill Walton
137W–65L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Robert Neary
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
Jacob Bush
28W–21L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Jeffrey Willingham
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.60
Ron Pinto
40W–24L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Michael Wills
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Matt Burnham
18W–25L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Brent Wagner
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
John Clancy
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Nall
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Cheriyampurathu
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Dukes
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.