Teams

JAdams (Ballantyne CC)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-02vs JSemones (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRamses Meijer / William Wade vs David Halvorsen / John Semones5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-18vs TCastain (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRamses Meijer / William Wade vs Tom Castain / Randy Barrett7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephan Custer / Daniel Sappenfield vs Troy Young / Scott King6-4, 7-5
2023-04-11vs DWatson (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Fain / Ramses Meijer vs David Watson / Steve Fellmeth6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSteve Delorenzo / Stephan Custer vs Tripp Donelan / ROB SAPPENFIELD3-6, 3-6
2023-04-04vs RMarks (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRamses Meijer / William Wade vs Senthil Kumar / Devesh Patel6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-28vs RSankaran/ILevelel (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Fain / Ramses Meijer vs Kevin Zhang / Koji Krzywosz7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStephan Custer / Paul DeMore vs Charles Chambers / Roderick Allen1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesRamses Meijer / William Wade vs Shaun Sikes / Kelly Hancock6-2, 7-6
2023-03-07vs JSemones (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Fain / Ramses Meijer vs John Semones / David Halvorsen7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSteve Delorenzo / Stephan Custer vs Loren Kane / Marc Soloway3-6, 0-6
2023-02-28vs JMarks (Providence CC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStephan Custer / Doug Baumgartner vs Jeff Ross / Peter Barlow6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Ramses Meijer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Christopher Fain
published 4
3.76
Jeff Adams
published
3.58
Scott Sanniota
published
3.34
Anish Patel
published 3.5
3.33
Doug Baumgartner
published 3.5
Stephan Custer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Kenneth Baker
published
Paul DeMore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Baumgartner + Ramses Meijer3350% games+2.5% vs expected
Christopher Fain + Anish Patel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ramses Meijer
69W–10L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Christopher Fain
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Jeff Adams
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
Scott Sanniota
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Anish Patel
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Doug Baumgartner
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Stephan Custer
27W–25L career · type S · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Baker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul DeMore
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.