Teams

KS/Meier/18&Over6.0MX

2026 KS 18 & Over Mixed Outdoor League · 6.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-17vs LobatosWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Palmer / DANIEL COZAD vs Jodi Blair / Darren Mark Bradley6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Mathew Sankoorikal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Juan C Ramirez-Mares
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Susan Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
3.01
Kareem Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Augie Meier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Liz Klausman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
David Knudtson
published 3
2.82
Scott Cole
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Nicole Meier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Dana Jolley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
DANIEL COZAD
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Annie Wiggin
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Klausman + Augie Meier7558% games−1.1% vs expected
Dana Jolley + Scott Cole4169% gamesnot enough data
Augie Meier + Nicole Meier224 matchesnot enough data
Liz Klausman + Mathew Sankoorikal213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Jolley + David Knudtson303 matchesnot enough data
David Knudtson + Nicole Meier303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mathew Sankoorikal
28W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Juan C Ramirez-Mares
35W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Susan Palmer
52W–87L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Alberto Camarillo
5W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Kareem Thomas
43W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Augie Meier
27W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Liz Klausman
39W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
David Knudtson
31W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Scott Cole
26W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Nicole Meier
32W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Dana Jolley
35W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
2.5
DANIEL COZAD
7W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
2.5
Annie Wiggin
4W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.