Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW4.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

23 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Wendy Cheng
published
4.31
Fran Compagno
published
4.28
Lisa Oktavia
published
Colean Tang
published 4.5
4.23
Erika Byrum
published
4.22
Beverly Christensen
published 4.5
4.21
Yuko Mihara
published
4.21
Cassandra Harms
published 4.5
4.20
Tula Kraiser
published
4.18
Zeynep Chasseray
published
4.16
Kate Yue Du
published
4.13
Lina Li
published
4.11
Jessica Ma
published
4.08
Kelly Uyema
published
4.02
Elani Phan
published
4.01
Nicole Stephens
published
3.98
Laura Norden
published
3.94
Ike Bunanta
published
3.91
Mary Ow
published
3.84
Liz Pearne
published
Jatica Pollack
published
Megan Caviglia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Oktavia + Erika Byrum5263% games+6.1% vs expected
Kelly Uyema + Lina Li2542% games−15.0% vs expected
Beverly Christensen + Ike Bunanta123 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Cheng + Nicole Stephens033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Oktavia + Yuko Mihara303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Cheng
23W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.34
Fran Compagno
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Lisa Oktavia
41W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Colean Tang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Erika Byrum
21W–15L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Beverly Christensen
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Yuko Mihara
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Cassandra Harms
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Tula Kraiser
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.20
Zeynep Chasseray
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Kate Yue Du
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Lina Li
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.13
Jessica Ma
55W–23L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
Kelly Uyema
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Elani Phan
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Nicole Stephens
29W–36L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
Laura Norden
12W–22L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
Ike Bunanta
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.94
Mary Ow
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.91
Liz Pearne
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.84
Jatica Pollack
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Caviglia
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Miyuki Motegi Tibbetts
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.