Teams

SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0B

2026 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-15vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesBernard Tormis / Douglas A Ensor vs Ryan Bates / Joe Hagerman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Pak vs Alex Tkachenko6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTed Arvisu / Humberto Lupi vs Paul Schoep / Adrian Caguiat4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-08vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0ALost 13
W#1 DoublesCarlos Guadiamos / Sachin Shah vs Vinod Swamy / Raj Dutta0-6, 0-2
L#1 SinglesRobert Hadowanetz vs Ryan Bates6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStanley Boehm / Humberto Lupi vs Paul Schoep / Adrian Caguiat6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDouglas A Ensor / Alfred Barton vs Joe Hagerman / Sandip Suman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-01vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Hadowanetz / Bernard Tormis vs Raj Dutta / Joe Hagerman6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDavid Pak vs Ryan Bates2-6, 1-6
2026-02-21vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesDouglas A Ensor / Robert Hadowanetz vs Joe Hagerman / Paul Schoep6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStanley Boehm / Humberto Lupi vs Ragu Subbiah / Sandip Suman6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Cowan / Alfred Barton vs Adrian Caguiat / Dean Caserza4-6, 0-6
2026-02-07vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesDouglas A Ensor / Robert Hadowanetz vs Frank Ciarabellini / Ryan Bates3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Pak vs Alex Tkachenko6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeff Cowan / Alfred Barton vs Vinod Swamy / Adrian Caguiat7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-01vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0AWon 31
L#1 DoublesRobert Hadowanetz / Douglas A Ensor vs Ryan Bates / Frank Ciarabellini7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDavid Pak vs Ragu Subbiah6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Davis / Ted Arvisu vs Joe Hagerman / Vinod Swamy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlfred Barton / Bernard Tormis vs Alex Tkachenko / Sandip Suman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-25vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0AWon 40
W#1 DoublesCarlos Guadiamos / Sachin Shah vs Raj Dutta / Sandip Suman6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Pak vs Paul Schoep5-0
W#2 DoublesStanley Boehm / Humberto Lupi vs Ragu Subbiah / Vinod Swamy7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteve Davis / Douglas A Ensor vs Alex Tkachenko / Adrian Caguiat6-0, 6-1
2026-01-17vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0AWon 31
W#1 DoublesCarlos Guadiamos / Sachin Shah vs Joe Hagerman / Frank Ciarabellini6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRobert Hadowanetz vs Ryan Bates2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Davis / Jeff Cowan vs Ragu Subbiah / Alex Tkachenko6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTed Arvisu / Bernard Tormis vs Raj Dutta / Vinod Swamy6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-01-11vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesDouglas A Ensor / Robert Hadowanetz vs Joe Hagerman / Paul Schoep6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDavid Pak vs Ryan Bates4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSteve Davis / Ted Arvisu vs Ragu Subbiah / Alex Tkachenko5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStanley Boehm / Humberto Lupi vs Vinod Swamy / Adrian Caguiat6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings45 teams · Men's 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LOS GATOS SR 40AM3.0B0742448302
2PLEASANTON 40AM3.0A09241227250
3FREMONT TC 40AM3.0A09241228255
4GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 40AM3.0A09241229272
5SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0B09241230262
6SILVER CREEK 40AM3.0A09211535312
7MEADOW STC 40AM3.0A09201639313
8ROUND HILL CC 40AM3.0A09171942322
9CROW CANYON CC 40AM3.0A09162044332
10ALMADEN SR 40AM3.0A09162047344
11MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40AM3.0A09152148346
12DIABLO CC 40AM3.0A09122451383
13BELVEDERE TC 40AM3.0A09122451354
14PLEASANTON 40AM3.0D0992755376
15SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AM3.0A09122456380
16GREENBROOK RS 40AM3.0A0982858365
17RINCONADA PK 40AM3.0A01035513214
18PLEASANTON 40AM3.0C01033720270
19OLYMPIC 40AM3.0A01031922262
20PLEASANTON 40AM3.0B01031923256
21PENINSULA TC 40AM3.0A010301026284
22JOHNSON RANCH 40AM3.0A010291128299
23LOS GATOS SR 40AM3.0A010291130289
24LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40AM3.0A010271331303
25DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 40AM3.0A010271333306
26WASHINGTON PK 40AM3.0A010261433291
27BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AM3.0A010231736294
28BLACKHAWK CC 40AM3.0A010231737314
29WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0C010251537337
30WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0B010241638314
31WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0A010221841315
32SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40AM3.0A010211944320
33BROADSTONE RC 40AM3.0A010192146375
34FREMONT HILLS CC 40AM3.0A010192146360
35LADERA OAKS 40AM3.0A010182246344
36SLEEPY HOLLOW 40AM3.0A010182252389
37PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.0A010162455391
38CLAREMONT R and S 40AM3.0A010142658411
39DIAMOND HILLS 40AM3.0A010142658389
40RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40AM3.0A010132761424
41RIO DEL ORO 40AM3.0A010122861410
42SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40AM3.0A010103063413
43MARIN YACHT 40AM3.0A01093166436
44CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 40AM3.0A01073369448
45DUBLIN HS 40AM3.0A01013979476

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Robert Hadowanetz
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.94
Ryan Short
published
2.90
Carlos Guadiamos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Jeff Cowan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Douglas A Ensor
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.82
Sachin Shah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
David Pak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.71
Humberto Lupi
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Bernard Tormis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Stanley Boehm
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Alfred Barton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Ted Arvisu
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stanley Boehm + Humberto Lupi314 matchesnot enough data
Douglas A Ensor + Robert Hadowanetz314 matchesnot enough data
Sachin Shah + Carlos Guadiamos303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Hadowanetz
10W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Ryan Short
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Carlos Guadiamos
13W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jeff Cowan
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Douglas A Ensor
8W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Sachin Shah
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
3
David Pak
10W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Humberto Lupi
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Bernard Tormis
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Stanley Boehm
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
2.56
3
Alfred Barton
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Ted Arvisu
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.