Teams

LA-LLW-Team Federer-Debbie Halim

2023 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Men 5.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.64 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-17vs LA - Team RafaLost 01
L#2 DoublesCharles Barrantes / Matthew Craig vs David Seidner / Mike Wegge2-6, 6-7
2023-08-27vs LA - Team RafaWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavis Kop / Godwin Omuta vs Hanre Chang / Joshua Schuftan6-1, 7-5
2023-08-20vs LA - Team RafaWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavis Kop / Henry Mak vs Hanre Chang / Mike Wegge6-4, 6-1
2023-08-12vs LA - Team RafaWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharles Barrantes / Victor Burga vs Oleksandr Ostrovskyi / Kyle Pawlak7-6, 6-3
2023-07-30vs LA - Team RafaWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharles Barrantes / Adam Scott vs Joshua Gurevich / Bryson Lee7-6, 6-1
2023-07-23vs LA - Team RafaWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharles Barrantes / Davis Kop vs Hanre Chang / Oleksandr Ostrovskyi3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.84
Henry Mak
published 5
4.72
Cameron Coe
published 5
4.59
Luke Roloff
published
4.26
Davis Kop
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Charles Barrantes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Amit Gupta
published 5
4.08
Adam Scott
published 4.5
4.04
Kevin Tan
published
4.03
Martin Chi
published
3.70
Dex Yamanashi
published 4
Kit Church
published
Matthew Craig
published
Shawn Hatosy
published
Victor Burga
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Davis Kop + Charles Barrantes4254% gamesnot enough data
Amit Gupta + Luke Roloff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Henry Mak
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
4.84
5
Cameron Coe
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.72
Luke Roloff
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.59
4.5
Davis Kop
79W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Charles Barrantes
138W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
4.18
5
Amit Gupta
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
4.09
4.5
Adam Scott
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
Kevin Tan
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
4.04
Martin Chi
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Dex Yamanashi
44W–38L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Kit Church
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Craig
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shawn Hatosy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Victor Burga
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.