Teams

Mid-Atlantic/Kim/Tri-Level4.5-3.5W

2025 NOVA Tri-Level · NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 4.32 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-12vs Team 5 LadyBaller High TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Kelley Regan vs Andrea Gevas / June Wheatley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-07vs Team 8 Called To ServeWon 10
W#2 DoublesErica Smedberg / Wendy Beale vs Carey Bryant / Melanie Regan6-2, 7-6
2025-09-02vs Team 7 Nova CrushWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Duffy / Wendy Beale vs Tina Le / Elisa Wolf7-5, 1-2
2025-08-29vs Team 4 Game Over Tri AgainLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendy Beale / Erica Smedberg vs Amanda Kerr / Karyn DeVito2-6, 2-6
2025-08-13vs Team 6 Belle HavenWon 10
W#1 DoublesGrace Kim / Kelly Blackborow vs Mia Elsheikh / Brooke Brown6-2, 6-2
2025-08-06vs Team 2 Shine TimeWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Duffy / Zoie Acadia vs Kristin Satterfield / Jill Holloman6-4, 5-4
2025-08-02vs Team 7 Nova CrushWon 10
W#3 DoublesSherra Dung / Zoie Acadia vs Tina Le / Alison Ouchna6-2, 4-6
2025-07-28vs Team 5 LadyBaller High TriWon 10
W#3 DoublesWendy Beale / Zoie Acadia vs Julie Moellering / Mary Newburn7-5, 3-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Maria Fedosenkova
published
4.52
Caitlin Lee
published 4.5
4.51
Kelley Regan
published
4.51
Anais Deerman
published 4.5
4.42
Heather Carr
published 4.5
Crystal Cornell
published 4.5
Erica Maebius
published 4.5
4.20
Kelly Blackborow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Brooke Simonson
published 4.5
4.10
Stephanie Pitts
published
3.90
Cindy Pham
published 4.5
3.71
Sherra Dung
published
3.69
Lydia Juh
published
3.68
Cathy Robertson
published 4
3.65
Zoie Acadia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Julie Duffy
published
3.48
Wendy Beale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Laura Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Beale + Zoie Acadia12365% games+2.1% vs expected
Wendy Beale + Julie Duffy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Fedosenkova
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.53
4.5
Caitlin Lee
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.52
Kelley Regan
19W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.51
4.5
Anais Deerman
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.51
4.5
Heather Carr
40W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Crystal Cornell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Erica Maebius
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Kelly Blackborow
135W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Brooke Simonson
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
Stephanie Pitts
58W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.10
4.5
Cindy Pham
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.90
Sherra Dung
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Lydia Juh
47W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.69
4
Cathy Robertson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Zoie Acadia
359W–171L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Julie Duffy
67W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Wendy Beale
315W–201L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Laura Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.