Teams

BH - Harding-Smith

Tri-Level Invitational 18 & Over · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Ashley Bentley
published 5
4.27
Mindy Kitchen
published
4.23
Katie Harding-Smith
published
4.16
Julie Duck
published
4.05
Hayley House
published
3.92
Elizabeth Bolt
published
3.88
Maggie Misner
published 4
3.79
3.10
Alyson Wood
published 4
Lindsay Grant
published
Rasha Ziedan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Harding-Smith + Elizabeth Bolt314 matchesnot enough data
Rasha Ziedan + Elizabeth Bolt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ashley Bentley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.77
Mindy Kitchen
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Katie Harding-Smith
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Julie Duck
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Hayley House
55W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.05
Elizabeth Bolt
39W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Maggie Misner
74W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Amanda Swearingen
103W–71L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Alyson Wood
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.10
Lindsay Grant
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rasha Ziedan
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Ginsburg Alexander
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.