Teams

GSTL65/Caulfield/Ind

65 & Over · 65 & Over LLAS - Men 4.0

6 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-13vs CTL65/Newman/CTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKen Steen / Joseph Rutkowski vs Robert French / Scott Newman7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Brooks / Thomas Cerasaro vs Douglas Deaderick / Mike Phillips2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesReggie Caulfield / Lawrence Ferraro vs Craig Aull / Glenn White6-2, 6-3
2024-10-13vs UPTA65A/Thomason/KrocWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoseph Rutkowski / Ken Steen vs J Mark Trexler / David Merline6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichael Brooks / Thomas Cerasaro vs Michael Thomason / MacK Thomason6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRoy Gum / Reggie Caulfield vs Barney Pannell / Scott Dickey6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over LLAS - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Ken Steen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Thomas Cerasaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Rutkowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lawrence Ferraro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Reggie Caulfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roy Gum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Steen
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
Thomas Cerasaro
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
Joseph Rutkowski
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lawrence Ferraro
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Reggie Caulfield
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Roy Gum
10W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.