Teams

OC LLW Cerritos Regional - Yoneko - Sat10

2025 OC 55 & Over Mixed Doubles · OC WE 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-23vs OC Anaheim TC - Konnie Vu -Sun*Won 20
W#2 DoublesMel Cabral / Gail Scott vs Barron Zitny / Pam Zitny6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEric Campos / Junko Noguchi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-02vs OC YLCC - Jerry - Sun3Won 10
W#2 DoublesEric Campos / Rosalinda Fazio vs Rene Varga / Debbie Lutz6-2, 6-0
2025-10-25vs OC Irvine LPC - Debra - Sat9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Miller / Junko Noguchi vs Jon Wang / Selina Mansonhing1-6, 0-6
2025-10-05vs OC Anaheim TC - Konnie Vu -Sun*Won 10
W#3 DoublesIrene Fehr / Forrest Morrow vs Robin Briones / Travis Moore6-3, 6-2
2025-10-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesForrest Morrow / Irene Fehr vs Terry Wong / Nannette Diesen-Ng7-5, 6-1
2025-09-28vs OC YLCC - Jerry - Sun3Won 10
W#3 DoublesForrest Morrow / Rosalinda Fazio vs Steven Vliss / Susan Leonardi6-1, 6-1
2025-09-20vs OC Irvine LPC - Debra - Sat9Won 10
W#3 DoublesMel Cabral / Gail Scott vs Jon Peabody / LanChi Bui7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC WE 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Gail Scott
published
3.38
Mel Cabral
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Irene Fehr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Lisa Dillman
published
3.05
Junko Noguchi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Eric Campos
published
Forrest Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Hiro Saito
published
Ken Lee
published
Virgilio Angeles
published
Yoneko Buritica
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hiro Saito + Irene Fehr9171% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Gail Scott
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Mel Cabral
141W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Irene Fehr
99W–98L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Lisa Dillman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
3
Junko Noguchi
72W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Eric Campos
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Forrest Morrow
26W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hiro Saito
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ken Lee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Virgilio Angeles
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yoneko Buritica
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.